people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers

Essay topics:

people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision-makers.

Human sentiments and behavior are a prominent part of psychology. Every human being reacts or responds to the situation according to the context around him or her. But the reflex action of all not necessarily germane every time as everyone facing different challenges of their own life. Sometimes our decision making quality depends upon practical approach or in the sentimental approach. The solution to the situation is highly subjective and different to every human being. Thus, it is invalid to assert people who decide without logic are poor decision-makers hence, I partly agree with the statement.

Firstly, every time a situation in one's life differs as subject to its context. So people who always seek a practical approach to crack a solution in their life are less emotional thinkers as they are more or less stuck with their principles. For example, in a situation like an earthquake presence of minds and decision making quality matters as the problem is of life or death. It is not a business problem in which profit or loss is essential.

secondly, sentiments impact an enormous effect on one's life as a person who always thinks by emotional values may have some different background. For instance, in the business between the family, every time decision making is tough as practical and sentimental approach come together but one must think with the context of the situation nor with overly practical and mawkish.

Moreover, wit and virtue are always not parameters to prejudice, one must always understand the two sides of the coin. like if one had a huge business failure other must support him not only with mental support but also with some practical mores of business.

In totality, one must be a maverick with the presence of mind and eschews the singular way of dealing with it. The punctilious thought process and incisive exegesis are valid but sentimental understanding bolsters the decision and makes it unbiased.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-30 JAkudike 66 view
2020-07-23 yash99 62 view
2020-07-17 vishaljuvekar10 50 view
2018-12-05 khaoula 50 view
2018-11-03 Bidusik47 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user vishaljuvekar10 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nt. Firstly, every time a situation in ones life differs as subject to its context....
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... in which profit or loss is essential. secondly, sentiments impact an enormous effect o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Like
...s understand the two sides of the coin. like if one had a huge business failure othe...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 321.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05919003115 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7403885011 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529595015576 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5687198902 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.70786347227 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234927744756 0.218282227539 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742124405944 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922739510242 0.0701772020484 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134165590851 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538261479807 0.0628817314937 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.5979740519 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.