Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments must act as a bulwark against the country going into Crises. A government can make or break a country. The prompt suggests that governments must act on immediate problems rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. In my opinion, i mostly agree with this for the following reasons.
To begin, Solving problems that pose an imminent threat to the economy must always be given paramount importance, rather than trying to build the country’s infrastructure. Whenever governments act lax towards such problems, the risk of a recession is always high. For instance, when the state Kerala in India was inundated with water, destroying houses, food scarcity. The state needed the government to act quickly but the government choose to act on building infrastructure and megacities all over the country. Now this state will take 2 decades to stand back on its feet. This example illustrates that problems that cause dire situations in a country need to be acted upon immediately and not focus on solving problems of the future.
Future, Certains problems can lead to a chain of events, creating a series of endless problems, which not acted upon in the inchoate stage will inevitably lead to the government perpetually working in solving them. For example, In every third world country education is one of the most important to be fixed. If ignored this is inescapable lead to an increase in the unemployment rate, as the students graduating from universities are not skilled enough to take up these jobs. This will then lead to a reduction in the GDP, as the number and quality of taxpayers are low. Therefore, it’s wise for a government to create ‘virtual circles’ where focusing on the current problem which in this case is education, Improvement in this section will lead to a higher employment rate and congruently increases in the GDP.
Of course, a government must not ignore potentially insurmountable problems in the future but fixing problems that matter right now must be the government primary concern. How effective is the government when it’s trying to eschew a problem that right now does pose a threat?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Governments must act as a bulwark against the country going into C...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, third, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10393258427 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.881113377 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536516853933 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1868797406 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.882352941 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255493718321 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832868871556 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089905490702 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171715462332 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515258148475 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.