Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments have to deal with a lot of problems. Some of the problems are relevant for tomorrow other problems are visible only in the age of years. The government have to think about those long-term problems and have to be proactive to counter those problems before it is too late to take action. So, governments have to be focussed on future problems next to today’s problems.
For example, global warming is a problem where the outcomes are barely visible now. We see small changes in water levels, temperature and ecosystems. However, if we do not do anything now the outcomes will be enormous in a couple of years. At that time problems are too big to fix on short term which leads to fatal disasters. Because we know about the development of those problems, there has to be a vision to counter those problems over many years which lead to an approach. If we wait till the results are clearly visible short-term actions of the government are way too late.
Another example is food problems in Africa. African farmers can’t grow food and as a result of that the African population is hungry. Governments who have a short-term vision will send food packages because it solves the result of a problem namely people who are hungry. Instead of sending food packages governments could choose to educate and learn African farmers how to treat their food in the best way, how to increase their production and how to minimalise hazard of failed harvest. By having a long-term policy governments have to invest once instead of tackle the result of a problem every year.
Another issue is the choice between preventing or curing. If we oversee problems we can make plans to prevent ourselves instead of curing ourself of the results of actions. Governments could make plans of education programs so that a country could educate their own people instead of buying expensive product in other countries. In this case it will cost a lot of money to make those education programs but buying year in year out will be much more expensive on long term. Preventing indicates a long-term vision which indicates that long-term policy is better than short-term policy.
After all, long-term policy is in most cases more valuable than short-term policy if we look into subjects as education, global warming and feeding problems. Tackling the problem instead of the result is the advice. Learn how to farm instead of giving food packages, educate people instead of buying the result of knowledge and oversee the long-term effect of handlings nowadays.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ts have to deal with a lot of problems. Some of the problems are relevant for tomorrow othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r many years which lead to an approach. If we wait till the results are clearly vi...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he choice between preventing or curing. If we oversee problems we can make plans t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, after all, as to, for example, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95348837209 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60674334577 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46976744186 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6814374637 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6086956522 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6956521739 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69565217391 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137785094391 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502292924731 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414371006987 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848346585894 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434610904278 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.