In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author claims that new and fresh minds are more likely to make important contributions in any field of research than experts does. Although it may seem plausible that beginners are more likely to make important contributions, we have to keep in mind that experience and in-depth knowledge is required to make a difference. There have to be a balance between beginners and expert to realise big inventions.
First of all, beginners are unprejudiced. This fact leads to another view on problems. Because of those new insights, they will choose other paths than the established experts did before. Choosing these new ways will lead to new insights which have the possibility to grow too big inventions. We have to keep in mind that all of our big inventions starts by somebody who taught in another way than everybody else.
On the other hand, experts are called experts because they achieve something in the past. Those achievements bring new information. On this side, we have to be thankful for those achievements and keep in mind which knowledge was required. It takes years to understand complex ideas in a lot of research areas. Without understanding those ideas it is not possible to make new inventions.
In additions, because of their experience experts know how to handle in a lot of situations because they are able to recognise those situations similar to situations out of the past. It is time-consuming if people are making faults by doing the same things wrong over and over.
To summarise, as well beginners as experts have their pros and cons. The beginner is more likely to choose the unknown paths. However, the expert familiar with complex theories and is able to recognise patterns out of the past. Concluded, for an optimal situation there has to be a mix between talented beginners and experts with years of experience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, well, as to, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98709677419 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81740539379 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9007311193 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3684210526 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1815357695 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581305726805 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492002101421 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104896471074 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676345741337 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.