Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
I fundamentally agree that government should focus on immediate problems of today but it should also not ignore the anticipated problems of future. The immediate problems are a must to be solved to improve the country. Contradictory to this the future problems should also be taken into consideration.
Immediate problems in the nation has to be solved urgently as they are the first priority for the government. Immediate problems can be of defence and which cannot be ignored at all. Government should take urgent steps to solve these problems as soon as it occurs and hence ensure the safety of the nation. Such problems cannot be ignored and hence as a result government should focus on solving immediate problems.
The latest hot topic in India right now is the problem of Ram mandir in Ayodhya. This problem of Ram mandir may lead to fights between two major communities in India and hence resulting in many disadvantages to the nation. This problem has to be taken in consideration by the government and urgently necessary steps should be taken keeping in mind the future effects of the decision. According to some of these reasons it should be agreed that government should focus on solving the immediate problems.
In opposition to these the future problems should also be focused upon by the government. Rupee is falling down in comparison to dollar and one day the importance of the rupee would be negligible. This is a future problem which requires the focus of the government and it needs to be solved for the betterment of the country. The falling of rupee in the international market would affect economically to the country. Another example of the future problem is the black money. People are not paying the tax and keeping the illegal money with them and which results in taking loan from the world bank. Thus, the problem of black money has to be focused upon and the money should be brought back to he government so that the nation doesn’t require to take the loan from the world bank.
In sum, the future problems as well as the immediate problems both are to be given equal importance by the government. Finally, in order to develop, government should focus on both the problems according to the priority level of the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...of future. The immediate problems are a must to be solved to improve the country. Cont...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 692, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to the government'?
Suggestion: to the government
...on and the money should be brought back to he government so that the nation doesn't require...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 749, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...so that the nation doesn't require to take the loan from the world bank. In sum,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, may, so, thus, well, as to, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85492227979 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69557064522 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.396373056995 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6599115602 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439627667284 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17859964515 0.0831039109588 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129000633642 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323933144089 0.150359130593 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107606948119 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.