Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Governments should always focus on the well-being of its people, that means preventing any problems for them. Even though I agree with the prompt mentioned in the essay, that “Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future”. I think that humanity and the world are behind in solving problems. Past Governments did not focus on solving either actual or future problems, and today we see consequences in our everyday life.
Sun-tanning became popular at the beginning of the 19th century, because it represented wealth and high social status. If you were tanned, it meant that you had time and economic means to go to the beach and enjoy time off. Nevertheless, it became a popular habit that was spread throughout the world. Sun burns, skin irritation and skin cancer started to appear within people that tanned regular. When that occurred, Government was concerned about the impact of sun exposing in people’s health. Government and private companies started an educational campaign. Nowadays, people are aware of the consequences when exposing skin in the sun, and people take precautions about it.
Global warming has been debated and researched in Governments for years, nevertheless proper action was not taken until recently. Unfortunately, experts agree that action was taken too late: animals, humans, and forests are suffering global warming. Polar bears are a clear example of global warming: North Pole is melting down and their option of survival is almost cero.
The previous are clear examples of how Governments did not address problems on time. They were seen as something that would become a problem in the far future and were not considered important. Today we are the generation that is going to bear all negative consequences. In spite of trying to resolve inherited problems, our generation is also going to be a victim of new problems. A good example to mention is the effects that cellphones are going to have in our health.
Right now, there are some diagnosed syndromes of the addiction that cellphones create on our everyday life, such as: FOMO (fear of missing out), constantly checking your phone, and being in touch with your contacts at all time. We are aware that mobile devices’ waves could create combustion; we know for sure not to use a cellphone when fueling our car. Nevertheless, we still do not know the effects of mobile devices in our body. Would mobile devices’ waves would be harmful for our body? Is it true that those waves produce tumors in our brain?
Looking at these examples a pattern can be observed: problems that were neglected because they were considered not a priority at that time, became a major problem in the near future. Looking and studying the previous examples, it can be concluded that it is extremely difficult and challenging to choose which type of problems should be solved: problems that are not solved today, would become immediate problems to solve in the near future. That is why, Governments should focus in solving immediate problems and also future problems before it is too late for our health and our world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
... tanned, it meant that you had time and economic means to go to the beach and enjoy time...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 295, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'choosing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: choosing
... is extremely difficult and challenging to choose which type of problems should be solved...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... too late for our health and our world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, well, i think, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2688.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74645766927 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498106060606 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5317442655 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5555555556 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81481481481 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365117320019 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865785270592 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144539689709 0.0758088955206 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190859955744 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222402798719 0.0667264976115 333% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.