Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.
It is undoubtly a inflammatory issue to judge the importance between art & military sector of a country. The goverments of each country is feeling tummlt during calculating the budget for both of this field. Despite art is key factor to build up a aesthetic society, military is the behind fact of keeping that art in the society. Therefore, there is no scope to spend that equal amount of money to the art sector compared to the military sector.
Firstly, Military force are the one & only one who are responsible for keeping the sovergenity of the nation which is the primary concern of any goverment while leading the nation. If there is no freedom in the country then the art produced by the countries artist is valueless. So for keeping the art in the country region it is mandatory to reinforce the military power & thats why it is needed to spend more money in military force than the art. Otherwise, the result can be worse like the ancient times like the what the British did in the Indian subcontinent. In the 17th century the British army captured the large Indian subcontinet because their army was not that strong & after that, ruling almost 200 years the British took away all the valuable art piece from the subcontinent.
Another fact to spend more money on the defense force because the instruments & the weapons are more costly than any other art materials. To protect a country the force need so many new technological weapons,bombs,tnaks & other stuffs which are really expensive in the world. Sometimes the weapons are as much expensive that the goverment dont have the ability to buy that ,so they take loan from the world bank to buy this. That can be clarified from Bangladesh scenario; the goverment took a loan from world bank to buy some tanks from russia. This things clarified that there is no chance to invest more money in art rather military field need much more money for the costly market.
Indeed, giving more impact on art would produce a more rational & aesthetic society. Yet, there is no value of that cultural society if there safety is not ensured. For example, suppose a country is full of artist of different generes but they dont have any stong military force. So what the other country would do? Some of them surely want to give a try to capture that country to enrich thier country with the art produced by the attacked country. Hence, there is no chance to compare the militray & the art with a same parameter to spend equal money.
In recapitulation, as long as the defense force are involved with the countrie's safety there is no scope to compare thier economic spend with other aspects of the country whether that is art or more important things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
It is undoubtly a inflammatory issue to judge the importa...
^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... Despite art is key factor to build up a aesthetic society, military is the behi...
^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...any goverment while leading the nation. If there is no freedom in the country then...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...he country then the art produced by the countries artist is valueless. So for keeping the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...atory to reinforce the military power & thats why it is needed to spend more money in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Otherwise, the result can be worse like the ancient times like the what the Brit...
^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , bombs
...e need so many new technological weapons,bombs,tnaks & other stuffs which are really e...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 340, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re as much expensive that the goverment dont have the ability to buy that ,so they t...
^^^^
Line 9, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...erment dont have the ability to buy that ,so they take loan from the world bank to...
^^
Line 9, column 547, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...rld bank to buy some tanks from russia. This things clarified that there is no chanc...
^^^^
Line 13, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of artist of different generes but they dont have any stong military force. So what ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, really, so, then, therefore, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77611940299 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54153079943 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456289978678 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6973210458 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7619047619 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139433693719 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449571250176 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353210414383 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788981173286 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025575767279 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.