A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
In the context the author claims that, the pet food company should not be face more analysis to find out the illness of the pets who consumed thier company food. Narrated in this way the author fails to identify several cardinal factor on which the argument can be justificated. Rather he provides some ill evidence to suport his conclusion that the pet cmapny did not find any unauthorized chemical to that pet food after test. However, careful scrutinuy view of that evidence reveals that there are lot of holes in the evidence which made the argument not fruitful. Hence, the argument need to be more analyzed with critical thinking.
First of all, the author easily dpend on the company test result which really does not make any sense to evaluate this argument. Since the company will not want to reduce or having any bad effect on their company business, it is much possible that they will provide always a postive result to show that thier company is not noxious. What if there is found a chemical which is not good for pets & still though the company make a result that evry chemical is okay? So to avoid these possibility the the food should be tested from other lab where there is no chance of being biased.
Another fact is that,the author here just generally mention about the pet & he did not mention about any specific pet name. Without knowing which pet are extermely affected by this food it will be inasupicious to judge the argument. If it happened that, there is specific pet like cats or dogs are facing problems by consuming this food then the analysis could have been different. Therefore, without having any survey on the attacked pets it will be imprudent to make any comment about the companies food.
Finally, the authour just stated here that all the food's chemical are approved for use. However, here he neglect another factor. What if though the chemicals are approved , there are contamination in the chemicals? Or waht if there is one batch of one chemical where contamination happened & that chemical mixed up with all other chemicals thus the whole food had contaminated by this? So without thinking of this logics & facts, the author's easily made up decision will make a impression to the reader the author is much indolent to find out the hole of the argument.
In summary, the argument can be considered unpersuasive as it stands. To butress it further, more survey on the pets & chemical compositon is needed. Finally to better asses the view the food need to the tested from other authorized lab except the companie's one.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 443 350
No. of Characters: 2071 1500
No. of Different Words: 203 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.588 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.675 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.357 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.095 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.634 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.308 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.525 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Narrated in this way the author fails to identify several cardinal factor on whic...
^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...which the argument can be justificated. Rather he provides some ill evidence to suport...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'provide'.
Suggestion: always provide
...ess, it is much possible that they will provide always a postive result to show that thier com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this possibility' or 'these possibilities'?
Suggestion: this possibility; these possibilities
...that evry chemical is okay? So to avoid these possibility the the food should be tested from othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... is okay? So to avoid these possibility the the food should be tested from other lab wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... is okay? So to avoid these possibility the the food should be tested from other lab wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 21, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ing biased. Another fact is that,the author here just generally mention abou...
^^^^
Line 13, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...imprudent to make any comment about the companies food. Finally, the authour just st...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 106, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'neglects'.
Suggestion: neglects
... are approved for use. However, here he neglect another factor. What if though the chem...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat if though the chemicals are approved , there are contamination in the chemical...
^^
Line 17, column 410, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...minated by this? So without thinking of this logics & facts, the authors easily made...
^^^^
Line 17, column 477, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...thors easily made up decision will make a impression to the reader the author is ...
^
Line 21, column 151, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...e pets & chemical compositon is needed. Finally to better asses the view the food need ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, really, so, still, then, therefore, thus, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 16.3942115768 91% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 442.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8371040724 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43903666894 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475113122172 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6134954901 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.80952381 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 23.324526521 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09523809524 5.70786347227 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.25449101796 247% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313819720467 0.218282227539 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101465686038 0.0743258471296 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984003332877 0.0701772020484 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201201695259 0.128457276422 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765917323431 0.0628817314937 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.5979740519 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.