Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
For the society, to roll on wheels of development, there significant efforts should be put into research of human population well-being and environment preserving. The history shows that the research in any field of science has brought an improvement to the human society to the great extent. But, unfortunately, not all the discoveries made by science have become beneficial for all living population on the planet Earth, or ethical. Therefore, I strongly agree with an author's claim, that governments should not support the financing of any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
First of all, to be able to completely understand the researches' purposes and possible consequences, the governments should be able to understand what plan of research they are presented with. In the case when a person that is responsible for the funding could reject the important medical research plan just because she or he has not completely understood the idea, can lead to lost opportunities and prevent particular medical field from development. Therefore, government ought to employ the team of independent scholars that would be capable to identify the pith, importance of the research, and possible consequences.
Second of all, the designated independent scientists that are responsible for the evaluating the research purpose have to clearly understand all possible outcomes of presented research study. For example, that might be the case, that the research that may lead to the development of alternative and renewable energy production may have a hundred of possible positive outcomes and one, that may lead to the catastrophe. This type of researches should be carefully examined and government should abstain from funding these research.
On the other hand, this type of approach may cut off many opportunities of development of current science.
In recapitulation, the government should carefully examine all the research plans and refuse funding those that may bring unclear results, because uncontrolled discoveries may bring not only the benefits, but harm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lation on the planet Earth, or ethical. Therefore I strongly agree with an authors claim,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an author' or simply 'authors'?
Suggestion: an author; authors
...thical. Therefore I strongly agree with an authors claim, that governments should not supp...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'a hundred'
Suggestion: a hundred
...nd renewable energy production may have a hundreds of possible positive outcomes and one, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a hundred' or simply 'hundreds'?
Suggestion: a hundred; hundreds
...nd renewable energy production may have a hundreds of possible positive outcomes and one, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...l the research plans and refuse funding those ones that may bring unclear results, because...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54368932039 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10403734039 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527508090615 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3336864391 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195992254776 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802776404242 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565232668337 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104952516636 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507350155206 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.1639044944 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.