Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
As the level of education gets entirely higher, more and more students are deciding to go to university rather than finding a job after graduating from high school. However, there are some students who forgo to go to university due to financial problems. In this situation, the argument that governments should financially aid those students in need has been continuously offered. However, it has been objected to as it is unrealistic with the process to choose who to support and the alternative solutions already exist.
Firstly, establishing a standard to select students to provide a free university education is realistically challenging, and it could be unfair. The possible problem happens if governments cannot offer a free university education to all university students. In order to select some students, fair standards are needed as the amount of money governments offer will be tantamount, and the money comes from tax. However, judging whether a student can afford the tuition is unclear as evaluating a financial state is somewhat ambiguous. For example, one might think estates and incomes of their parents can be measured, however, not all the citizens report their incomes transparently. Thus, the one who trustfully reported can be disadvantageous, as result, it is unfair. With regard to this point, offering financial aids for university tuition to selected students hardly holds water.
Secondly, there already exist alternative solutions to support students financially. Many universities and foundations offer scholarships to brilliant students such as received good grades or won a big prize from a well-known conference. Hence, there are many chances to get financial assistance from various sources if students try their best and achieve a certain success. Considering this situation, offering financial assistance to students in need without any conditions or significant reasons rather than their financial states can be an obstacle to students to put more effort to achieve something or even be unfair to those who put lots of effort to receive scholarships.
It is true that there are students who cannot afford university tuition due to their financial state. However, as it is challenging to provide fair standards to select students to aid and there already exist other alternative solutions, the policy of governments’ subsidy for tuition seems unnecessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'providing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: providing
...al state. However, as it is challenging to provide fair standards to select students to ai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, such as, it is true, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2032.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47708894879 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07042989811 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498652291105 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7600365926 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.529411765 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259707357455 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980465769799 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668858597996 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179140327725 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435657050728 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.