Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Whether the governments should offer a free education to even those who can’t afford it, could be a contentious issue. However, I feel education should be a fundamental right and one must not be abstained from exercising it. The government should definitely offer its aid to the unprivileged students, even if is unaffordable for them.
Firstly, I think, a student is the foundation for the development of any nation. If we invest in his education, we never know, what he becomes tomorrow. He could be a scientist, sending satellites into space or an athlete bringing gold for the country. For instance, the late Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam, famously called as the missile man of India, was an impoverished child. He was a son of a mediocre fisherman. During that time, there was no such scheme as free education. Despite this fact, he toiled hard, and eventually became the President of India. Dr. Kalam is not the only such precocious talent, in-fact there are plenty, just wanting in monetary matters. Had there been a scheme to provide free education, such dexterous talents could be easily discovered and utilised for the well-being of the country.
Secondly, education, provided in any form, shapes the inchoate mind of a student. A child’s mind is too amenable. It is as good as its architect. If put to wrong hands, could lead to egregious outcomes. Terrorism is the result of the same. Every year thousands of innocents are trained to kill, fight and perform all the unscrupulous deeds. The ones who enrol for these activities can’t be put to blame. Hapless and poverty stricken, they don’t have access to any worldly knowledge. Due to lack of formal education, the innate conscience which we are able to develop, is simply absent in them. Be it the horrific attacks of 26/11, Mumbai or the heinous attack on World Trade centre, ultimately tracks down to dearth of education.
Thirdly, if observed from a holistic point of view, one could infer, the root of all the problems is illiteracy. If not resources, problems are something that are copious in the world. For instance, today, a country is faced with a problem of diminishing natural resources. This has been engendered by a population burst. Further, the prime reason for population burst can be linked to the subject of illiteracy. A survey conducted in India, in 2011, states that, 30 percent of the population have kids just to support the family financially, by performing menial jobs. Imagine, if a formal free of cost schooling is made mandatory, it would have a great impact on the parochial mindset of the people. The point to be made here is that, the government could use this policy as a panacea for all the underlying problems up to a massive extent.
Although, at first, such a policy might appear good on paper, and pragmatically hard to implement, but for the greater good, it is something that needs to be done on a priority basis. To conclude, in my opinion, I feel the most powerful tool in the world if exists is anything but knowledge, and to put it to a greater good, the government must offer a free education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely tracks down to dearth of education. Thirdly, if observed from a holistic poi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance, i feel, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2572.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82551594747 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78399866458 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 290.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544090056285 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3207719226 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.375 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65625 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136799164775 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032488099162 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057713474136 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829920383408 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723603385194 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.