The function of Science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each
The society we live in today, stands on the foundation of both art and science. It is impossible to imagine a world without the two. The claim made by the prompt is seems to be based on naïve assumptions and a premature conclusion. It arrives at an inept conclusion without considering the holistic view. I am completely against the notion stated in the prompt.
First, one needs to understand, science and art go hand in hand. Science around us in itself is a piece of art and the art is in some way dependent on science. Both of them complement each other. For example, Leonardo the Vinci, the prowess painter of his times, is renowned for his painting the “Monalisa”. However, a lesser-known fact about him is that, even before wright brothers, he was the one who had proposed the design for flight. Citing this specific example, it is quite eccentric to think art as something which is intended to upset.
Second, it is not always true that Science has always worked on the favour of the world. Science is as good as its intention. On one hand science can be treated as a panacea, while on the other it could be used to build machines of mass destruction. To illustrate this fact further, consider the blasts on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. God forbidden; such a situation should never arise in the future. There are no accurate stats on how many lives were lost. The devastation continues till date in some form or the other. Father of the atomic Bomb, Dr. Alfred Noble cursed himself for his invention. After taking this incident into account, how can we classify science as the protagonist of the story?
Third, it is simply erroneous to neglect the contribution of art till date and term it as a downgrade. Today art plays a major role in blending the most vivid and diverse characters in society smoothly. Not just today, but this has been continuing since centuries. While India was under the British tyranny, there came a time when the freedom fighters came to a dead end to promulgate the independence movement further. This was where they used art in the form of theatres and dramas to communicate their message to the masses. It proved one of the most effective ways to persuade people to join the freedom struggle. Even today, we have memes and cartoons that convey a lot more than an editorial article would do. Considering this point, it is irrelevant to say that the role of art is to upset.
From a holistic approach, it can be concluded that, the prompt has drawn a premature conclusion based on broad generalization and it fails to establish the claim. As observed from the mentioned illustrations, even Science has a darker side and art has the ability to do wonders. Thus we can’t warrant science as a reassurer and art as an up-setter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... and art has the ability to do wonders. Thus we can’t warrant science as a reassurer...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 486.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69958847737 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69683313166 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547325102881 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0445732 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6774193548 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6774193548 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41935483871 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17168948913 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412813996409 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514947834046 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908765781418 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464818599931 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.