Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Should the government provide free university education to any students who cannot afford the tuition but are admitted to a university? Some argue that the government should take the responsiveness for students to afford their tuition; however, others assert that this policy made by the government would be useless for students. In my view, the policy of paying the tuition by the government is not a feasible way for students to finish their studies in college.
The policy seeks to bridge the financial support to a growth in the incentive for students who live in penury families to accomplish their studies in college. The assumption is that increased funds would reduce the obstacles for students to learn intently to pass the exam. According to this theory, one could argue that without tuition offers, students would need to find alternate methods of paying tuition and repaying the debt. The suggestion releases the pressure on students to enroll the college by supplying the tuition from the government.
However, this policy does not necessarily preclude the plight that makes the expense problem for students. The preceding argument reveals that the government solves the problem by supplying the tuition and helping the students to be registered in school. This effort does not consider the need for students to study in college. In fact, there are plenty of factors that could make the burden on students in unexpected ways, destroying the motivation for students to pursue a college degree. The economic condition of the family, for instance, is playing a critical role in students’ career process. With increasing income in one’s family, students become more incentives to pursue advanced knowledge. Likewise, despite receiving funding support from the government, students may also drop their studies because of lacking expenses in other semesters. Solutions to the tuition problem seems to oversimplify by politicians and teachers.
In contrast to expectations of the consequence of the policy, we can even see how this education policy deteriorates the fiscal program in the government. As mentioned above, students who receive the full funding may abandon their studies in college, regardless of the extensive financial support. The measure to supply the tuition for students, such as student debt and funding, would bring the government into a heavy expenditure on the annual financial program, heavily enlarging the debt hole for the government. If it happens, the government will hardly resolve this problem. In short, the original statement was ignoring the policy outcome, creating havoc for the government on fiscal policy.
Tuition problems will always degrade the government performance, from education to the fiscal. Given the economic problems in the country, there will be on limit to the number of predicaments, either old or new, for us to tackle. All told, consequently, no need for the government to formulate a policy on the tuition issue, but rather to provide scholarships that encourage more incentive for students to fulfill their studies in college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to finish their studies in college. The policy seeks to bridge the financial...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the tuition from the government. However, this policy does not necessaril...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...implify by politicians and teachers. In contrast to expectations of the conse...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for the government on fiscal policy. Tuition problems will always degrade the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, likewise, may, so, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in short, such as, in contrast to, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 37.0 12.9106741573 287% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2619.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36680327869 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79510525326 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485655737705 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2159452158 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.869565217 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26329447277 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879746183401 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986986577777 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179419023771 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12018570994 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.