Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been

admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning

for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the

possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape

your position.

The speaker asserts that governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who is incapable of paying the tuition. From my perspective, the statement raise valid points for claiming that when the students cannot afford the tuition, the governments are obligatory to provide financial support to them. However, it is too extreme to assert that they should offer a free university education to all this kind of students.

For starters, providing free university education to students who pass the university entrance examination but cannot afford tuition do bring about a myriad of benefits. It can incubate elites for the nation, such as the scientists and high-tech elites. For example, Yuan Longping, an outstanding scientist in China, was once subsidized by the country to study in the Beijing University. After he graduated, he dedicated himself to tackling the starvation issue for several years. Eventually, he managed to produce hybrid rice, which dramatically alleviated the starvation and famine in the impoverished countries. If he had not acquired the patronage from the government, such an elite may not be discovered and cannot make his contribution to the nation. Also, Yu Minhong, an eminent entrepreneur, can also be taken as an example. He got free education in Qinghua university, which laid the foundation for him to establish the biggest and the most profitable English education enterprise. Both of them can prove that the governments’ financial support to the students can bring about numerous benefits.

However, never can we take the statement to the extreme. Even though it is beneficial in many aspects, the feasibility and the negative impacts it may exert should be taken into consideration. First, if the government funds are limited or even inadequate, it is not reasonable to offer free university education to all the students who cannot afford tuition. Under this scenario, the government should allocate its budget evenly to all basic facilities rather than merely education. For instance, there are so many areas where need the government funds, such as the medical care, the transportation, the pension and so forth, that government should not only care about university education and allocates its funds unevenly to it, especially when the country’ economic is in a poor condition. Moreover, the free education is likely to cause some negative effects. For example, the students may not cherish the chance of studying without being charged. People always dismiss the things for free, thus the students may not study hard. As a result, they cannot make contributions to the society and the financial support to them is just a waste of money.

Overall, it is true that governments should give financial support to the students who have been admitted to the university but cannot afford the tuition.however, the statement is too extreme for claiming that governments should offer such support to all this kind of students.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2559.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30912863071 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98523206962 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489626556017 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 804.6 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.571583684 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.318181818 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352758163444 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105591831795 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122315265827 0.0758088955206 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26364162831 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846137345095 0.0667264976115 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.