Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A group will be more helped by a person who is willing
to do things what other members want than a person who strongly insists on things in a way that are different from
other members want.
No matter in which kind of group, people may frequently raise controversy about the issues they are discussing. The majority of them may comprise and keep pace with the ideas of others, while some of them unflinchingly insist on their pursuit which may be entirely different from the others’. Thus, from the practical point of view of some people, a person who is willing to do things what others members want is more beneficial to the group than the one who is reluctant to do things as expected. Nevertheless, I definitely disagree with the statement since I think these two kinds of people are equally helpful to the prosperity of a group.
For starters, people who always give top priority to other members’ desires are indispensable in the group. Not only are they conducive to the harmonious atmosphere in a group, but they also help the group’s long-term development. If every one in the groups is reluctant to take into account others’ suggestions, it may render the absence of cohesion as well as collaboration, which may in turn be detrimental to the further progress of the whole group. Thus, people who are willing to satisfy their companions’ desires are extremely significant in a group. For instance, according to a research conducted by the New York Times, over seventy percent of people want to be employed by the entrepreneurs who make everyone else count. In this way, the employee can feel that they are involved in the decision-making, which can spark their enthusiastic for their work, thus they are willing to work effectively to promote the company’s development. Therefore, a person who always conform with others’ wishes are of great significance.
However, even though a group needs aforementioned people , it does not mean that people who strongly insist on things that are different from others’ expectation are of no help to the whole group. Instead, without this kind of people, there will be less opportunities for the group to acquire innovation. Examples can be found throughout the history of modern society. Thomas Edison, who lived one hundred years ago, at the dawn of the electrical age, invented the electric light bulb, electric generator and cinema projector. Although his great achievements are widely respected by us, his efforts were regarded as strange and unfeasible insistence by his contemporaries. A century later, Elon Musk, who lives with us in the digital era, founded Tesla Motors, Paypal, Space X which seemed unrealistic before their emergence. He has also encountered the same condition like Edison, but his uncompromisingly dedication to his unique idea engender his success. Both of them gained unprecedented achievements and lead their group to be recorded as part of history. Hence, people who hold different opinions are certainly the key determinant of the groups’ success.
Overall, I totally oppose the statement that people who are willing to do things others like are more significant than those who insist on their own ideas which are different from others’. As these two kinds of people are both crucial for the prosperity of the whole group. The former ones play an essential role in the harmony of working environment, and the latter ones can bring about dramatic innovations.
- The following appeared in a health magazine."The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than 55
- Some companies in the United States have developed "wellness" programs that give rewards or incentives to employees for achieving certain health-related goals, such as stopping smoking or losing weight. The rewards and incentives include cash pr 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people who have similar views than the news presented by those who have different views from you. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals."One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the topselling cereal compan 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
...ough a group needs aforementioned people , it does not mean that people who strong...
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
...hout this kind of people, there will be less opportunities for the group to acquire ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 533.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2138836773 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07201104982 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519699812383 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 870.3 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6388575038 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.826086957 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1739130435 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37685168062 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106114547245 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123575586645 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259400568846 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903027366019 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.