Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

The basic claim of the author asserts the implementation of free university education to any student who is not financially capable to do so. The claim seems logical at a first glance, supported by the fact that education is a primary and prerequisite condition towards development and progress of any individual and consequently of the world as a whole. Financing university education has been a substantial impediment to the individuals who belong to a middle class family or diffident to take the risk of heavy loans. Under such a scenario it is only sagacious for the governments to offer an option of free education, at least to the ones that are indeed ingenious but just couldn't embellish due to the paucity of financial resources.

However, scrutinizing the assumption and evaluating the potential consequences resulting due to such implementations, it can be observed that making university education free could result into overall deterioration of the quality of education. University education requires enormous resources which can be fulfilled by the astronomical amounts of money charged to the students. This problem can be solved if the government agrees to pay for the students through a program specifically designed for the financially weaker students. Such programs do not necessarily stipulate the governments to make the university education free; rather introducing more accessible forms of scholarships and education loans can serve the purpose. Thus, it is not necessary to make the education free.

Further, the ramifications of providing free university education could be detrimental to the university as a whole if the student's financial incapability is incredible. For example, a student admitted to a university may be wealthy, but somehow manages to express his financial incapability to the university, thereby fraudulently enjoying the government resources. Also, the means to prove oneself to be financially incapable need not necessarily be illegal; one might even legally prove it. Hence, if such a policy is to be introduced then the rules and regulations regarding a person's financial status should be stringent and clear.

In addition to these consequences, making the education free for a particular individual, while the rest of the people being imposed of a heavy burden may lead to the existence of discrimination among the institution. There might be cases of riots or fights among the students of an institution if such a policy is introduced.

Nevertheless, the claim of the author is not entirely refutable. Education is the right of every individual and it would not be entirely unjust to make it free; but university education is something that cannot be served for free to everyone. If the government, in future, decides to implement such a policy than it must be ready to mitigate the pejorative ramifications such as discrimination, fraud and injustice.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 679, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ones that are indeed ingenious but just couldnt embellish due to the paucity of financi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 580, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...hen the rules and regulations regarding a persons financial status should be stringent an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...or free to everyone. If the government, in future, decides to implement such a policy tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as discrimination, fraud and injustice.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, thus, while, at least, for example, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2460.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3711790393 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29025899241 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504366812227 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 812.7 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1647901704 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.666666667 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234149348986 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841370666058 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570175231547 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134128393868 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473245382609 0.0667264976115 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.