Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Every student has a right to education. We cannot let penury and lack of the ability to pay tution fees restrict these minds from blooming. Hence, governments should offer a free university education to all those who were capable enough to make it to the cut off but had to keep their dreams and aspirations hidden beneath the cloak of poverty.

New minds have new ideas and these form the bricks on which a nation's prosperity dwells. The idea of offering a free education to the needy is in fact very beneficial for the government because these will be among those people who will outshine in the field of medical sciences, data sciences, engineering, politics, administration, transport, finance and what not. The government would be getting a million dollar worth of return from what it would spend by giving these students a ray of hope and the most important thing for which they strive-an opportunity to prove their worth. This opportunity would assist these students to agglomerate all that they have and assimilate all their learning and prove to be an asset for their country.

There are some students who struggle hard to pay their education fees by working side by side and managing their academics simultaneously.
The problem here is that because of these, they might take a longer time frame to complete and pass all their courses because their focus is dived between academics and to gather money to fuel it. Sometimes, the efficiency gets reduced and all students may not be able to cope very well with this kind of an arrangement. The government by providing the entire funding would definitely help so many more students to take up courses of their interest and emerge out with flying colors and at the same time finish off the courses well in time. This way they can add to the society sooner.

However, I believe that the concept of free education should be accopanied by some constraints as well. This is because, there is a possibility that after receiving the funding a student might become careless and his/her focus might shift from studies partially or completely. Their goals might just get reduced to getting a degree from a reputed institution instead of working towards achieving their best. In order to avoid this kind of a state where the potential student as well as the investment of the government both are at risk, they could utilise a restriction on the academic score each year for availing this free education policy. Failing to athe meet the academic score criteria should deprive the student from this privelege. This kind of a setup would surely help the students to remember thier goals and objectives of choosing that university and keep the fire within them still burning.

Hence, by providing such free education facilities with some constraints for being able to avail the same, the government would definetly prove to be a great support in fulfilling the dreams of several students.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...as and these form the bricks on which a nations prosperity dwells. The idea of offering...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 297, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...not be able to cope very well with this kind of an arrangement. The government by providin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 432, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ving their best. In order to avoid this kind of a state where the potential student as we...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 746, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...e the student from this privelege. This kind of a setup would surely help the students to...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, in fact, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92354124748 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5984402305 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513078470825 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 757.8 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9572225459 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.789473684 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1578947368 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15704546312 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510211044801 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040364005697 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904360134629 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369910027198 0.0667264976115 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.