Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society indeed. If logical reasoning is seeded inside children from the very beginning as a foundation of their education, it would contribute to increasing morality index in societies on its own.
Instead of a didactic moral preaching of what is right and what is not, education should be such, that these things become self-derivative. With foundation of logical reasoning, people on their own would be able to distinguish between wrong and right when faced with unexpected scenarios and situations. If we keep teaching children that cheating is not right, there would be some who would heed to it and others who wouldn't even bother about what we have to say. Instead of this, if we explain them, why this thing, "Cheating is not right" should be followed and why we came up with this conclusion, it is more likely to put an impression. Likewise, educating people about not stealing because it is not morally right is less persuasive in comparison to letting them logically derive and understand on their own why this is not the right path to follow. Similarly, if we succeed in explaining why different genders need to be respected equally instead of just telling that it was the right thing to do, it would have more impact on people.
If we find a person who met with an accident and is completely bleeding, the urge to take him to the hospital doesn't come from the fact that we were taught to help people in need, but it comes from the reasoning that if we do not help this person, his life might be in risk.
Though, logical reasoning foundation would result into producing a moral society, we can't completely deny the fact that teaching morality as the foundation of education would completely be a waste. It is the words of our elders, teachers and parents which keep reverberating in our minds until our last breath. So, if from the very beginning it is taught, what are the good manners, that we should respect our elders, talk to people politely, keep the surroundings clean, maintain integrity in whatever we do and say, it is more likely to do some good if not completely contribute to a moral society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ome who would heed to it and others who wouldnt even bother about what we have to say. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...g, the urge to take him to the hospital doesnt come from the fact that we were taught ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 86, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...sult into producing a moral society, we cant completely deny the fact that teaching ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77023498695 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7302216754 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483028720627 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5627773084 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.25 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9166666667 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308405510188 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138316101547 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118342221852 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208605363675 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114118717864 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.