Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Inherent physical differences in men and women no longer play signifacant role in circumscribing the ability of any of these genders in performing any given task. It was only in the pre historic era and the cave times when different roles were defined for males and females depending upon their physical differences. If it was a male, it was thought that he would be going out in the forest, hunting and gathering food and means to survive. If it was a woman, she was meant bear children and take care of the house and the family. But, in recent times, both the genders have proved that they are equals and there is absolutely no task which any one them cannot perform if they have courage, determination and passion to do the same.
There is absolutely no profession left where we have not seen both men and and women perfoming exceptionally well. The fields of medicine, law, teaching, agriculture, sports, aviation, transportation, science etc, each one of them have seen males and females proving their worth. In the commonwealth games, we have seen how both the genders bring so many medals for the country. We haven't been able to segregate their abilities of performance here based on their physical differences. Both the genders represent their country in the competition and when they win they bring laurels for the country. In scientific discovery, we cannot differentiate the findings and achievements of Einstein and Madam Curie based on the physical difference in their genders. It doesn't have any effect on their thinking and abilities in any way, what matters is the curiosity to know more and discover. Whichever person would possess this trait would be able to perform well in this field and physical differences would have no role to play at all. If there is a belief that men are better off technically than women and are more suited for mathematics and reasoning, then its completely wrong because women have proven their worth and shown that they are no less. Dr. Anita Borg had and outstanding technical mind and she was a keen supporter of all those who could perform well technically. She infact started a scholarship for women who code and had the intent to bring an impact on the world. Also, the misconception that men were not really good at household chores and taking care of children has been proven wrong in the recent times because, men have shown how well they can perform this task also and equal women.
Though inherent physical differences have very inconsequential effects in defining roles that men and women can perform, they may have an effect in the way different tasks are performed by different genders. For example, if there is a manual or a labour task like brick lifting, then women might be able to complete it at a slower pace as compared to men because of physical differences. But, these are very negligible differences and can be overlooked. The kind of task would not be defined by differnces like these though pace of it sometimes can be.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...cant role in circumscribing the ability of any of these genders in performing any given t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 642, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...s and there is absolutely no task which any one them cannot perform if they have courag...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...on left where we have not seen both men and and women perfoming exceptionally well. The...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...ring so many medals for the country. We havent been able to segregate their abilities ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hysical difference in their genders. It doesnt have any effect on their thinking and a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1155, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ted for mathematics and reasoning, then its completely wrong because women have pro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, so, then, well, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2483.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8213592233 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68927482349 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477669902913 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9105976909 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.238095238 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5238095238 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167047342197 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543477977625 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356405041807 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119234310909 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155166136873 0.0667264976115 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.