The author of the claim suggests that governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but can't afford the tuition fees due to some financial constraints. This is credible to a certain extent. One may argue that there might be millions of students who can't afford tuition fees and what if the country's economy can't support the needs of all students. However, education is considered as a basic right entitled to students and depriving the students of their education due to a few financial difficulties isn't right either.
Firstly, the governments should come up with new schemes which is available to students who have a tempestuous financial status. Denying a student his basic educational rights due to his pecuniary status implies inequality. This could mean that such students don't attend college despite the fact they are of a great caliber. Hence, the government could be of help by implementing schemes which offer free education to such students. This will motivate more students from an unstable economic background to pursue higher university education.
Admittedly, if the government offers free education to such students, the universities might go on a protest saying that the college needs the tuition fees for infrastructural development or the facilities available on campus or even the salaries provided to the teachers. Hence, providing education at a free cost might not be a viable option. Instead, the government schemes could include the government paying the tuition fees which eases the burden on the parents and also helps the child to pursue his education at a good university. For example, in India, a non-profitable organisation called 'Akshaya Patre' has been brought into force to provide free education and free food for students in the age group of 6-13. Likewise, employing schemes which could provide scholarships to such students or a different fee structure would be beneficial.
Additionally, in India, the government has come up with a different fee structure for different financial statuses which is an affordable option. This could be implemented too. Thus, in conclusion, a few critics might assert that it is unfair that a few students are receiving free education but depriving a student of his basic rights on the accounts of his financial status is definitely a letdown in the history of humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o has been admitted to a university but cant afford the tuition fees due to some fin...
^^^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...there might be millions of students who cant afford tuition fees and what if the cou...
^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n fees and what if the countrys economy cant support the needs of all students. Howe...
^^^^
Line 1, column 561, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ion due to a few financial difficulties isnt right either. Firstly, the governmen...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ity. This could mean that such students dont attend college despite the fact they ar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22480620155 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94500194842 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480620155039 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.900102651 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.941176471 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268422281165 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919559156368 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845315279162 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1781481264 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623812338142 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.