Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Science is the study of physical and natural world through observation and understanding it has in no doubt had a major positive contribution to man’s wellbeing and improvement. There has been a lot of positive changes about man right from the stone age to the classical era and to the present phase. I therefore strongly agree with postulation that Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. I will give more explanations in subsequent paragraphs
To start with, science research has led to several discoveries that has been used to make inventions, which are utilized every day by millions of people and helps to make life more easier, it was the basic study and exploration of the mechanical and electrical laws by scientist such as Michael Faraday and Sir Isaac Newton that led to manufacturing of equipment such as automobiles before this invention man lived a peripheric life style in which he had to travel many distances on foot to eke out a living, this was not only stressful on his physic but also made achieving success in any endeavor very slow and daunting. Other equipment such as tractors where also produced which helped greatly with farmers to achieve better output in terms of quantity and quality of their products and gave their consumers more satisfaction with their purchase.
Furthermore, when there is enough support from the government with little or no restriction, adequate budget will be in place without which most scientist will not be able to make meaningful and timely progress in any research. For instance, adequate funding will enable more schools to be able to purchase the laboratory apparatus that will be used by students to carry out controlled experiments, which will allow them to gain insights on the relevant theories that they have chosen to work on. Also, when there is enough financial provision both government and school authorities will be able to search for and encourage very brilliant students to pursue scientific disciplines through sponsorship and various grants that will enable even pupils from poor or low-income families to study and make meaningful contribution to the society at large.
Finally, though few restrictions will help in making sure that science research is as ethical as possible and will deter people or countries from damaging activities such as prevention of massive production of nuclear weapons by North Korea, governments should give full support and enabling environment for the growth of scientific research and development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re explanations in subsequent paragraphs To start with, science research has led ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...llions of people and helps to make life more easier, it was the basic study and exploration...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, no doubt, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2354368932 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8753552445 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567961165049 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 23.0359550562 195% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 160.908531643 60.3974514979 266% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 239.666666667 118.986275619 201% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.7777777778 23.4991977007 195% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5555555556 5.21951772744 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160317621289 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791494154881 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684766728901 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102552700476 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230149221267 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 14.1392134831 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 48.8420337079 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 12.1743820225 171% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.0 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.38706741573 123% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 11.2143820225 178% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.7820224719 178% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.