Governments should place few, if any , restrictions on scientific research and development.
The growth of an economy and betterment of lives of people are based on current and previous research and developments. On the other hand current threats the world face are also because of the scientific developments so to say governments should place few, if any, restrictions on them is understandable
The lot of inventions which we enjoy and which make our work and lives easier are developed as a result of scientific research and development but at the same time we can also see many inventions like Nuclear Bombs which is a threat to the whole humanity' s existence is also as a result of science. It is very well seen after the attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So scientific research as a whole not only enhances our way of living but also threatens it.
Let us consider the medical industry, we all now that Stem cells can be used in healing any ailments but these cells are found mainly in pregnant ladies so there are cases where pregnant ladies are aborted purposefully to get their stem cells and use it for research or for healing patients. So restriction in research in these areas are mandatory.
Without restrictions in research areas there are a lot of possibilities where people could invent or develop things which can cause destruction and bring harm to this world rather than the good. For example Scientists have theoretically proven that Neanderthals can be brought back after building the genome pattern from the skeletons of the species. But the implications it may cause once we bring them back are not known who knows they might also turn against humans. So restrictions in these cases are a mandatory one. We also understand that research in curing diseases, energy production from natural resources all needs to be encouraged but it should also be made sure that such researches won't affect current balance in our ecosystem.
Thus, implications of scientific research needs to be analyzed completely by a regulatory body and accordingly the restrictions needs to be applied considering primarily their implications rather than the new things it will bring into the lives of people.
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249329758713 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.171581769437 0.157235817809 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0723860589812 0.0880659088768 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0643431635389 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0536193029491 0.0444667217837 121% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134048257373 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0482573726542 0.0406280797675 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85599987057 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0187667560322 0.030933414821 61% => OK
Particles: 0.00268096514745 0.0016655270985 161% => OK
Determiners: 0.088471849866 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0268096514745 0.0249443105267 107% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0187667560322 0.0148568991511 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2119.0 2732.02544248 78% => OK
No of words: 356.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95224719101 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317415730337 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.25 0.280924506359 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188202247191 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134831460674 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85599987057 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533707865169 0.48968727796 109% => OK
Word variations: 57.8558204029 55.4138127331 104% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 29.6666666667 23.380412469 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 120.34149903 59.4972553346 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.583333333 141.124799967 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 23.380412469 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.674092028746 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 54.6666666667 51.4728631049 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.49074074074 1.64882698954 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218427909249 0.391690518653 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126028684886 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0862469324217 0.077325440228 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.596380736605 0.547984918172 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.224362300053 0.149214159877 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805068649681 0.161403998019 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687902572648 0.0892212321368 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.277462786371 0.385218514788 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0939794108371 0.0692045440612 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137779412353 0.275328986314 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101536538017 0.0653680567796 155% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.