The statement supports the idea that government should be inactive to scientific research and development. It is true that from the aspect of academic freedom, restriction from the government to confine scientific research is harmful, since researchers has to be neutral and objective to their research.
If restriction has been exercised, research might be affected by the tendency of the government, which may bias the reality of the research to prevent from being banned and ceased by the government. However, in certain cases, I believe that restrictions are needed.
Scientific research related to humanity need to be scrutinized carefully. For example, the duplication of human beings. Duplication has long been a controversial scientific research, certainly, it is truly stunning and edge-cutting to have a duplication of oneself. However, it also galvanizes protesters and dissidents since as it appears to be inhumane. Moreover, it draws more problems if there is no restriction on such research. Crime rates might increase drastically, and when people are accused of involving in a criminal, they can simply argue that it is done by their duplications. With these potential treats and risks that people are unable to control, restrictions is the most expedient way to the problem. Another example is the chemical weapon. Without any restriction, virus related research might transmogrify into a new development of weapon.
Moreover, the fund of scientific research is partly from the government. In order to prevent scientists that received money from the government being inactive and wasting, it is reasonable for the government to enact some regulations and rules that researchers need to abide to: such as regular report of the progress, budget examination, etc... After all, these money are from the taxes of citizens in the country, the government are responsible to scrutinize whether these money have been used wisely and appropriately. The restrictions are not exerted directly to the content and direction of the scientific research, yet the restrictions circumscribe the process of it. Hence, the statement of the article that any restriction is not allowed appears to be too dogmatic.
Nevertheless, other research that is not subsidized by the government and does not related to humanity, I believe fewer restrictions will be beneficial. Academic freedom should be respected by both people and the government. After all, scientific research and development is the impetus of technology. Without the buttress of scientific research, technological advancement can't be prosperous. Hence, government should not interfere scientific research as much as possible, only if it is necessary.
In sum, to some extent, I conditionally agree with the statement. Government should revere the freedom of academy, while some restrictions can't be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
..., budget examination, etc... After all, these money are from the taxes of citizens in the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 470, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...t are responsible to scrutinize whether these money have been used wisely and appropriately...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 84, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'relate'
Suggestion: relate
...bsidized by the government and does not related to humanity, I believe fewer restrictio...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 374, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...fic research, technological advancement cant be prosperous. Hence, government should...
^^^^
Line 10, column 140, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...dom of academy, while some restrictions cant be ignored.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, after all, as to, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55580865604 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20652235084 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473804100228 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.3210603726 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.56 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.56 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356276363037 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109789396672 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091166243919 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216221157042 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096913492969 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.