Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Research and development has been a major part of every comapanies be it automobile, manufacturing, energy develoment, electronics in the world. The prompt suggests that this department like any other department of a company, must have restrictions. I mostly disagree with the prompt and provide two reasons for why this boundry may affect the result of research. However, I concede that there are a few conditions where these activities must not be left completely free.
First of all, scientific research are always capricious. To pressurize in finding a particular result is utterly absurd. If a particular outcome is expected, then there is no point in conducting the research. The aim of a research project is to discover new findings that is obscure till now, or that is the further growth of the knowledge known at present. For example, if Wright Brothers were given a limited resource, and if they were deprived from further study after first attempt was unsuccessful, we would never have these large flying bodies in our sky that has made out travel easy and fast. Thus restriction is a malevolent action that doesnot do good in the process determined to bring new development.
Secondly, restriction bridles research activities. New discoveries require patience and must be meticulous in every aspect possible. This means a lot of time as well as effort must be given. For instance, astronomical findings require decades of study and observation. During this period, there is a significant utilization of manpower, economical resource, as well as infrastructure. Setting a specific period and cost to these activities can produce no results; or outcomes found, can be considerably flawed. These circumscribed environment hinders the persuasiveness of the outcome as well as sap enthusiasm of the people involved.
However, there will be certain cases where the credibilty of the research activity must be evaluated forehand, for a better result. If an automobile industry begins new research in hope of replacing rubber tyres with metal ones; it is almost an impossible and pollyannaish result at current time given the comapany has very less precendent knowledge in tyres and there were no previous research in the field by the people involved in this new project. This is simlply a waste of time and other valuable asset of company which could be used in some other result oriented activities.
In conclusion, given the expectation of the research and development activities as well as available status of information and resource the project must be selceted so that, working in the task during course of time does not pressurize the team in getting the output. If the freedom cannot be given, then it is almost good not to initiate the research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...that has made out travel easy and fast. Thus restriction is a malevolent action that...
^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the freedom cannot be given, then it is almost good not to initiate the research...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17410714286 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98645699494 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537946428571 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3325440452 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95454545455 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103210395187 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318785716998 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304110437125 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609675925504 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287103538039 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.