As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I

Essay topics:

As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Universe is itself a mystery and every process occurring can never be fully evaluated. There has been continuous development on each and every sector but none have achieved complete comprehension. The prompt discusses that the more information we get the more inscrutable things comes forward. I mostly agree with the prompt and provide two reasons for why knowledge of a specific matter can never be satisfying but also concede a few cases where the knowledge makes us savvy not further ignorant.
First of all, the deeper we get into a subject matter, further complicated activities are found. These processes can never be known to a surficial observer and unlocks only after a detailed evaluation of external form. After a brief study only, the presence of the activity can be visualized and further research can be done. We can take example of elements of a matter. At the initial phase, only matter was known which after some study was found to be made of small particles known as atoms. Atoms are further studied to determine the presence of sub atomic particles and a recent finding have just determined that more small particles known as quarks form these sub atomic particles. This certainly proves that more complex and difficult things are being found which does not have a fixed ending since every object is made up of some other smaller objects. Hence one of the main reasons for why knowledge seems to create further mystery is due to the discovery of hidden parameters.
Secondly, humans are never complacent and they want to have more of anything than they possess at present. This nature of humans develops a chain of why and how questions which can never be satisfying and ended. If a certain fact is known, people try to find the reason and its way of existence. After determining the existence, more debonair question and conundrum develop about the presence of factor that cause the development of the activity. For instance, in research of space people initially tried to grasp knowledge of earth which gradually extended to moon and then further to other planets and even stars and other heavenly bodies. Scientist have now even studying to find the possibility of life in other planets. So, gaining of knowledge itself does not create mystery but it is the character of humans to achieve more and have a unquenching thirst of knowledge that surfaces unknown activities creating further unknown situations.
However, if we become happy and limit our demand in any field for more information the knowledge that we get after study for a certain time makes us fully aware of the things that were precedingly unknown and can have better understanding of the activity. The complexity is aroused by the quest of analyzing the outcomes and further interpretation of the consequences. If the habit of leaving behind a subject once a desired goal is reached, then the things can become comprehensible to some extent.

Thus, the incomprehensibility is a product of our own proclivity to understand more, explore more and make a process further easier and beneficial which by default sets its new target once an older achievement is met.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...information we get the more inscrutable things comes forward. I mostly agree with the ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 399, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nowledge of a specific matter can never be satisfying but also concede a few cases where the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 860, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... made up of some other smaller objects. Hence one of the main reasons for why knowled...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...f why and how questions which can never be satisfying and ended. If a certain fact is known, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 841, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cter of humans to achieve more and have a unquenching thirst of knowledge that su...
^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arget once an older achievement is met.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2632.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98484848485 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73622006654 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505681818182 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 846.9 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9650881913 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.434782609 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9565217391 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220183524254 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637276784088 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559812986888 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139305285665 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241417555284 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.