Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people argue that reading paper material is more fruitful than having it displayed on some technological device since book actually provides the taste and feeling of study that cannot be provided by a digital device. I, however, disagree with such views and expound my choices with these two reasons.
First of all, reading book is a tedious activity and the job becomes more arduous when the quantity of information to be read is large with books having more pages. Most people often gets subjugated by the size of book and lose interest in learning new subjects. However, if the same reading and learning process is done through electronic device by use of online class, videos, audios of professors, acquiring information becomes more interesting and exciting. Moreover, electronic devices reduces time to gather the knowledge than that of reading book. I, myself have known about Mahabharat, one of the story of a great battle in Hindu religion, from the movies and plays of the war. I would never have known about it, if I had to go through book. Hence, electronic devices have made reading more fun and has saved time to collect the facts.
Secondly, learning from digital displays are cost effective than that of buying books. We can easily have pdf files from internet of almost every book which is frequently free of cost. If these virtual files have some price, they will be much cheaper than that of getting new book. Further, paper materials needs to be cared and draws attention for protection. Bookshelves must be made to store them which comes at a high price depending on the type of design wanted by an individual. On the other hand, files in devices doesnot require any attention and can be accessed at the time of use only. Previously, enthusiastic book readers would spent large amount of money on buying these paper printed copies which can now be available almost free on internet. So, from the financial point of view too electronic devices are more effective.
Thus, in conclusion, it can be extrapolated that learning from a virtual environment is more advantageous by increasing people proclivity toward reading and also saving budget to gain information.
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 60
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 66
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
...iously, enthusiastic book readers would spent large amount of money on buying these p...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9727520436 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58328159076 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564032697548 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0494902855 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.388888889 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160488168931 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549953028714 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467418775425 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100351306377 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041115399137 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.