The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A person who achieved great things that can be used for the wellness of the people and nation will always have an everlasting fame. Regarding whether or not a person greatness is to be decided by the next generation or the contemporaries of the current generation can be a debatable topic. I mostly support that people of same time must decide the greatness and achievements of the person using two examples mentioned below. Greatness of the person depends on doing the selfless service they offer and do not expect anything in return. The greatness of the person should only be decided by the people who saw and experience the selfless service exhibited by the person.
To begin, greatness of a person should only be decided by the people who experience it. It is likely that the younger generation might hear about a person’s good deeds but they can not have a proof if all the generosity the person possessed was true or not. For example, Mahatma Ghandhi have done many great things for India, and he was considered a father of the nation by his contemporaries and his picture has been used on the rupee notes in India. Today students in the schools are been though about the greatness, the sacrifices and the good things Ghandhiji has done. Therefore, from the example we can understand that people who witnessed the greatness of a person automatically decide to praise and upheld the person and they will definitely pass this to the your generations.
Furthermore, there is a possibility that the communication gaps might create misunderstanding and kill the greatness of a person or either a person who got a fame must be a wrong person to hold this greatness. For instance, We have heard about Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi, who were great businessmen. Initially, people thought that they were going to take the country next level to due the immense business strategies and their businesses might also increase the economic situation of India. But, later on, people realised that they have come to a conclusion that is completely against what Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi were doing. Even government did not have any chance to suspect them and instead indirectly supported them to continue bankurpcy. For this example, we can understand that people have come to an conclusion initially but, they have realise the wrong doings of these highly talented business man and changed the initial conclusion. Therefore, we can understand how people from the contemporaries have decided the greatness of a person.
Although, there are many supporting instances that might suggest to decide a person’s greatness and who should decide the greatness of a person. There is an opposing statement that can support the possibility that next generation must decide the greatness of an individual. For instance let us talk about Madam Cury who was a scientist and was working on radioactive material has died due to cancer. Her death discovered that radioactive material is harmful and working around it is hazardous to human health. Although she her greatness was not judged by the contemporaries. The next generation realised her sacrifice and named a radioactive metal as Curium on behalf of her sacrifice. Such examples are many that can slightly contradict that greatness of a person can also be decide by next generations.
In conclusion, greatness of an individual never dies and it is carried to younger generation inspire and fire a spirit in them. Although it is true that great can be judged by the next generation people, it is likely that it should be always decided by the same generation individuals in order to understand the truth and experience of other contemporaries. There may be a communication gap or rumours that can go through next generation and spoil the decision if the greatness is being passed to be judge by the next decade people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ays have an everlasting fame. Regarding whether or not a person greatness is to be decided by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 763, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'your'?
Suggestion: the; your
...n and they will definitely pass this to the your generations. Furthermore, there is a p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...can understand that people have come to an conclusion initially but, they have rea...
^^
Line 3, column 848, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'realised'.
Suggestion: realised
... an conclusion initially but, they have realise the wrong doings of these highly talent...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 58, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest deciding'.
Suggestion: suggest deciding
...re many supporting instances that might suggest to decide a person’s greatness and who should dec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 510, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...around it is hazardous to human health. Although she her greatness was not judged by the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3209.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 647.0 442.535393258 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95981452859 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.04343084457 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86216412002 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.412673879444 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1007.1 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2664067218 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.851851852 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.962962963 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168934098512 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617802175648 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429372937205 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114640976132 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182137530769 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.