The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their
contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
History is repleted with stories of great individuals. These individuals, who are known for their massive contribution towards the development of mankind, have acquired acclamations from numerous people. However, some feel this veneration should only come from individuals who had primitive experience with these magnates. But the effect of these magnates’ work is not only felt by these individuals. Modern man also feel these pundit’s impact. Hence, the greatness of individuals can be decided by their cohorts and those who live after them.
To begin with, the dexterity of government officials is not only determined by those who live with them but also by those who live after them. This is because, either good or bad, the effect of governance reflect on all and sundry. While those who lived alongside good public official like Abraham Lincoln can testify to his great leadership, those who lived after him can also attest to this greatness as they felt the impact of the emancipation movement which was pioneered by Abraham Lincoln. Hence, saying Abraham’s greatness should only be determined by his counterparts is farcical.
Apart from this, the sleight of great scientist is determined by both their contemporaries and those who lived after them. Breakthroughs in science have impact on both the old and present generation. Our developments, most of which are championed by great inventors such as Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison, have reminded us not forget how great these people are. Thus, it will be grotesque to conclude that these people’s greatness can not be determined by people who lived after them.
However, a well reasonable individual might quibble that 21st century dwellers do not have primitive contact with 20th and 19th century inventors. Thus, it will be ludicrous to base our acclaimation on hearsays or histories. This is might be true. Hearsays and histories are often adulterated. The denouement of this is the extraneous underscore that is given to the individual who is being touted. But we also need to put into consideration these magnates’ value. Without history, anybody seeing The Mona Lisa, which was concocted by Leonardo Da Vinci, will also attest to the greatness of this artist.
In summary, the importance of past contributors who have had salient impact on human development can be determined by both their contemporaries and those who lived after them. This is because their work’s impacts span through several generations. Hence, it will be ridiculous to conclude that these greatness can only be determined by a few set of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this pundit' or 'these pundits'?
Suggestion: this pundit; these pundits
...these individuals. Modern man also feel these pundit’s impact. Hence, the greatness of indiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this greatness' or 'these greatnesses'?
Suggestion: this greatness; these greatnesses
... it will be ridiculous to conclude that these greatness can only be determined by a few set of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 338, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun set seems to be countable; consider using: 'few sets'.
Suggestion: few sets
...e greatness can only be determined by a few set of people.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, in summary, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26014319809 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87211845643 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491646778043 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5701888207 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8333333333 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296004886611 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897743089118 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880713745991 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185079372508 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446457331901 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.