The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
The stated issue suggests that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. However, my opinion stands in contrast to the argument. It is not justifiable to conclude that ones achievements and discoveries will take his lifetime to be recognised and appreciated. There are several instances as stated further in the essay to justify my stand.
With support to my stand, considering folowing examples: Sachin Tendulkar, MS Dhoni and many legendary cricketrs are idols for many, are appreciated, even have their chapters taught in schools, have movies based on their lives and achievements while they were still not in the to even retire. Not only cricketers, all sports who have shown their tallents be it PV Sindhu, or Sania Mirza or Ronaldo or even Messi are known for they being best at what they do by the younger generation, the generation older than them and even their contemporaries. Apart from the sport players, there can be instance of a politician too.
Condisering the current Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, he is known worldwide for his greatness and the deeds, improvements and modifications that he has made. Since he was being appreciated and the majority of Indian population had known his potential, he was elected as next Prime Minister from te Chief minister of India. Apart from Mr. Narendra modi, there are several other politicians whom we have been electing since we trust their potential, respect their skills, and even relect them if they work efficiently for the betterment of the nation.
There is another sector to be visited next to the politicians, the buisnessmen and the creators. Elon Musk teh craeteor of Tesla and Space-X, Ambani owner of Reliance Company, Mark Zuccerberg etc... are some of the greatest example whose creations are appreciated, used and are known to have potential to be of great essence of development further. It might be the case that it is appreciated by the future generation too, but that will not suppress the fact that it is no less renounced in within their parallel youth.
Getting a step lower to ones common lives, we can see, there have been many hcildren with specialities and tallents in specific stream or genere. These tallents are obviously identified by their parents/ etachers or their peers. Consider Tailor Swift: her talent of singing was identified at very tender age and still she is one of the persons to be very important to the music industry. However there can be an exception to my stated justifications.
Taking into account the case of several scientists, their discoveries may take decades to be recognized and appreciated. Many scientists have made exceptional discoveries that were identified to be true and were remarkably appreciated later from then after the death of that scientist. It has
even taken years for them to prove their theories and there has been case when greatness was decided only by those who liveed after them and not by their contemporaries. However, this scenario is not accountable for the majority of people.
Thus, in conclusion there it is not necessary that ones tallents, discoveries, achievements be unseen and underappreciated until their afterlife as per the above-stated examples. It is may take time for this to be recognised, but, in majority of the cases, teh stated argument stands to be not true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Chief) must be used with a third-person verb: 'ministers'.
Suggestion: ministers
...ed as next Prime Minister from te Chief minister of India. Apart from Mr. Narendra modi,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 389, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e very important to the music industry. However there can be an exception to my stated ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fter the death of that scientist. It has even taken years for them to prove their...
^^^
Line 14, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stated argument stands to be not true.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, then, thus, while, apart from, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 44.0 19.5258426966 225% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 33.0505617978 185% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2856.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07282415631 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89318435788 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499111900533 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 891.0 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1734591171 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4583333333 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45833333333 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355569166824 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101887826701 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155159172284 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174308058292 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115311671735 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.