The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the past few decades, there has been an exponential growth in the field of technology. Starting from the building of computers to human being mimicking robots, the advances in this field has been enormous. But with this advance, there also comes the question, will machines become superior to humans one day? Also, a lot of science fiction movies are based upon robots taking control of the world and humans as slaves under them. So, this leads us to deliberate upon this topic and, I, by agreeing with the movies disagree with the prompt and I would like to back my stance with the following reasons and examples.
First of all, in the past two decades, the areas of machine learning and neural network have gained immense popularity. This concept is based on the way humans perceive and learn things through experience and how the neurons in the brain are activated upon external stimulus. This field has the potential to replace humans with robots in several workplaces. In fact, machines have already supplanted humans in a few places. A rudimentary example would be a coffee vending machine, where the coffee is brewed by a machine, whereas before, it had been done by humans for several centuries. A more advanced example would be in postal systems where robots now do all the sorting and distribution of mails.
Secondly, let's take a calculator. It was a tool used to aid humans in calculating faster but the computation speed of these devices is colossal as compared to the computation speed of a human. The calculator was just a simple tool that was developed decades ago and humans have come a long way from there. A recent research in the field of quantum mechanics to create quantum computers might hold the key to the future of mankind. Quantum computers are far more advanced than the PC's that is currently being used across the world. With the integration of artificial intelligence and quantum computers, it is theoretically possible to create an intelligent machine superior to a human and thus leading to the creation of a new species.
To conclude, one-day, machines may be superior to the human mind. One might say that even though it is superior, it is still controlled by a human and hence its always the human mind that is superior. However, with the introduction of artificial intelligence, humans have created robots with a higher degree of autonomy, consequently leading them to make their own decisions and make changes as they see fit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'machine'
Suggestion: machine
...ce, there also comes the question, will machines become superior to humans one day? Also...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...he way humans perceive and learn things through experience and how the neurons in the b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: Recent research
...humans have come a long way from there. A recent research in the field of quantum mechanics to cr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86698337292 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66447971626 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532066508314 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.816961075 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.45 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.05 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242587017894 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774937367984 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621604767027 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154111595976 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436170916442 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.