If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Here author asserts that any methods are reasonable if the goal is justifiable. This claim might hold true in certain grounds, however, it is an unfair generalization in that it fails to account for other empirical evidence serving to discredit it. If a goal is worthy, not all methods could be accepted. To achieve our goal, we take the necessary steps and actions towards our success.
Firstly, what the word 'worthy' actually mean? The word 'worthy' has different meanings for different people. Anything that is worthy to us, may not be beneficial to all the others. It can be a goal like personal context; a goal for weight loss; a goal to achieve good marks and so on; a goal to start exercise; and so on. Others can have goals for wider context; nuclear peace between nations; no corruption in the country; economic equality in the country; and so on. All these goals are beneficial and helpful to society. But on the contrary position, what about the goals that are evil and harmful to others? So, the worthy goal depends upon the person's desire and how it is beneficial to others.
Moreover, a famous axiom says that there are two ways to achieve the goal- the easy way and right way. Easy way helps us to achieve our goal in a short time. But after achieving the goal through easy way one can not get the desired success after a long period of time. On the other hand if one achieve his goal in the right way will help him a lot in the rest of his life and will not have regret about his accomplishments. For example, consider the scenario of the exam. There are two ways to score good marks in the exam. One can obtain the good marks either by working hard for the preparation or by doing cheating in the exam. If the person achieved his goal by doing cheating in the exam, then the question is, whether he actually achieved the objective? Whether he had actually gained the knowledge about the particular subject? What will happen in the future? What will happen in the job interview? On the other hand, the students who have worked hard will be more beneficial in the future.
Also, here author uses the words 'any means'. This describes a very broad view. It simply means any possible way to achieve the desired goal is justifiable. This is not true all the time. Sometimes the method which the people follow cause harm to the society. For example, during the second world war, United States of America has dropped the nuclear bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki situated in Japan with a view of becoming the most powerful country in the world. This attack hearts the Japanese people very badly and even today they are suffering from the side effects of the nuclear radiations.
Ultimately I am completely disagree with the provided statement. At first glance, the author's statement seems acceptable, but from all the above possibilities we can say that if the goal is worthy then all the moderate methods are justifiable, not any means of possibilities as that can cause violence in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 254, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ot get the desired success after a long period of time. On the other hand if one achieve his g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 28, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
... Ultimately I am completely disagree with the provided statement. At first g...
^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 87, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rovided statement. At first glance, the authors statement seems acceptable, but from al...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, for example, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2505.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69981238274 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45616147269 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482176360225 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2213009524 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9090909091 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1515151515 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93939393939 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219802182857 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553246482224 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743730934034 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132994025899 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406323474053 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.