If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
The statements avers that as long as a goal is worthy, then any means taken to accomplish it are justifiable. There are some definitions required to be done in order to better assess the statement. However, I agree with this statement under certain circumstance. I shall elaborate my thoughts in the following essay.
To begin with, there is a qualification needed to better assess the statement. First, how to determine if a goal is worthy? Generally, a worthy goal means it brings achievements to people in the form of anything possible such as fame and fortune. Moreover, if a goal is beneficial from any aspect, achieving such goal is essentially considered worthy of doing so. For example, in order to alleviate global warming, a government can pass certain acts to prohibit factories to emit excess gaseous chemical into the air and require them to install the latest purifying machines. The acts surely burden these factories’ financial situation; however, compared to saving the world from destruction, such regulations seem to be reasonable and justifiable. Therefore, if the goal is considered benign and necessary, every mean to achieve it is justifiable.
However, not every goal is based on positive purpose. There are goals that are based on self-interests and do nothing but harm to others. For example, during 1930s, the Nazi German’s epic resurgence from World War I was considered the most crucial goal by the contemporary government. When Adolf Hitler reigned the country, he carried out a series of policies in order to reconstruct the post-war German. However, some policies seriously violent citizens’ rights. Tragically, the Nazi German regarded races other than pure Aryan as filthy, second-rated races and decided to engage in an elimination activities. Among the oppressed races, the Jewish were the most miserable. Some are lucky enough to escape and stay in other countries while others were slaughtered merciless by the Nazi German. Albert Einstein, one of the most influential physicist, was forced to flee to the US and could no longer return to his country. The Nazi German’s goal was to make the country great again. However, what the government has done was never considered justifiable. Thus, the statement is fallacious under such circumstances.
Finally, I firmly believe that only under certain situations will the statement be valid. As mentioned above, as long as the goal is beneficial to the majority and it does not result from a terrible consequence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'aver'.
Suggestion: aver
The statements avers that as long as a goal is worthy, then ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
..., then any means taken to accomplish it are justifiable. There are some definitions...
^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1930s'.
Suggestion: during the 1930s
...othing but harm to others. For example, during 1930s, the Nazi German's epic resurgence...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as for, as to, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26799007444 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05047465765 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565756823821 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0941553022 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.92 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.12 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227312493652 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637708879114 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123608070831 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14058943914 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947950183088 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.