To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
The statement asserts that to be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. I firmly agree with this statement and I shall elaborate my thoughts in the following essay.
To begin with, contrary to law which force people to follow basic rules, ethic and morality are shaped, developed by individuals as well as societies. People regard morality as a baseline of behaviors and any violation of morality is unacceptable. Therefore, in order to be an efficient leader, a public official is expected to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards as a leader serves as an example of the citizens. Otherwise, the authority becomes worthless and despicable once a leader cannot even scrutinize his own behaviors. For example, if a prime minister is involved in a bribery and yet his propaganda promotes an idea of honesty. Is it persuasive for the citizens when the prime minister cannot live up his own words? Consequently, in order to be an effective as well as convincing leader, it is crucial for public officials to obtain and uphold the highest ethical and moral standards
Secondly, public officials are meant to serve their citizens and societies. In return, citizens pay taxes and some of which become public officials’ salaries. In other words, public officials and their citizens have developed a reciprocal relationship with each other. Therefore, since citizens believe the contribute money to pay public officials’, they always expect them to be a group of decent, dedicated people. To be concise, if public officials do not behave well or even neglect of their duty, citizens may become fierce. For example, police officers are expected to help and protect citizens. However, once they have commit malfeasance, such as shooting people at their will, beating prisoners or get involved into scandals, citizens would become outrageous and force the government punish them. Because citizens consider police officers justice and it is unacceptable of them to betray any basic moral standard. Also, citizens may disregard any word from police officers if any of these incident happens. Therefore, a chaotic society may appear since polices have lost trust in their citizens.
Admittedly, some may argue that it is unnecessary to examine so closely to a public official’s moral practice since what they have contributed to his society and citizens is the only thing matters. For example, throughout human history, there are a lot of tyrants who is famous for their brutal regime over a country, yet they still contribute great cultural, civil and even technological improvement of their times. However, that not always the case.
As mentioned above, it is indispensable for a public official to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards in order to be an effective leader. Since a leader is required to be persuasive and trustworthy. Moreover, a public official is expected to serve his citizens to contribute a better society. Therefore, I firmly agree with the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 309, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ther. Therefore, since citizens believe the contribute money to pay public officials', th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 637, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'committed'.
Suggestion: committed
...otect citizens. However, once they have commit malfeasance, such as shooting people at...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, such as, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2587.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29038854806 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91808934402 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466257668712 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 846.9 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3049190976 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.48 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.56 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.48 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437483008306 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137410806442 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.215171823121 0.0758088955206 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.317114559768 0.150359130593 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190125815841 0.0667264976115 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.