If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Every person on the basis of their background and yearn have different perspective towards goal. Some are fanatic and some are tempered but the important gist is the approach towards attaining ones’ motive. The prompt thus given mention one extreme view about achieving the goal which cannot be agreed in all possible manner because of following reasons.
First of all, the statement given is more likely to resemble the well known quote, everything is fair in love and war however, and the given context is quite different. People can be an extreme and dangerous character once they are fervid about achieving one goal. If the goal is worthy, it does not necessary mean to harm others or bring about precocious situation just for the sake of a justifiable aim. For example, in any profession, the competition for fame, payment and promotion are always at top but just because one dream to become the executive officer does not mean he/she denigrate the next competitor or cause any harm to them. Such a scenario is much vivid in politics; where an ambition to be in power is either paid with money or with life. The basis of morality and decorum does not fit into place just for achieving the primal goal of one.
Secondly, for a revolutionary cause the method applied for achieving it are always justifiable. For example, the road to independence for many countries had to go through the harsh time of war. Even war is always considered to be a disgrace in the face of humanity; the lost lives, the lost infrastructure, the lost family etc. are always taken into consideration when compared to the freedom they received. Here, the method and techniques taken are far draconic but the end result has served well for all who fought for it and for those who perished for it. Similarly, Mahatma Gandhi revolutionized through non violence and peace which ended up splitting the huge nation into two parts. Even though the whole nation departed, the attainment of freedom and its cost are always acceptable and revered by all. Therefore, for such a circumstance, any means taken are justifiable and acceptable.
Lastly, any goal that serves the welfare of the people should be justifiable and acceptable in attaining it. For example, if the goal is to serve the destitute instead of investing on some ideal project then the financial cutoff for such lavish project can be justifiable as it is not serving the need and demand of people which is crucial and of more significance. Similarly, the extent of goal must be defined. For example, if a country invests its entire sum on landing on moon at the extent of feeding the people such a goal must not be justified by any means. The goal should be relevant for benefiting all rather than a single customary service.
To sum up, every goal is important as there lays expectation and dreams behind it either be a personal or a common, each goal has significance. However, the extent of achieving it must not be pernicious to any person or a country as a whole; it should be based on common ground of serving self without harming others or serving the whole as one entity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t for the sake of a justifiable aim. For example, in any profession, the competit...
^^
Line 2, column 585, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'denigrates'.
Suggestion: denigrates
... executive officer does not mean he/she denigrate the next competitor or cause any harm t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...use the method applied for achieving it are always justifiable. For example, the ro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2584.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 540.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78518518519 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82057051367 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65332051199 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487037037037 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 832.5 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4720530879 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45833333333 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22681650555 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722013247791 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774641815638 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122084466299 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049657806141 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.