If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nowadays, people are willing go to any extent to fulfil their dreams. I disagree with the prompt that any mean mechanism of attaining the goal is justifiable, even if the goal if worthy. Following are the two illustrations and a concession to support this.
Firstly, in this selfish and cunning world people are willing to jeopardise anything just to be able to move ahead in accomplishing this goal. They are ready to sacrifice the morals, law and ethics. However, these means of achieving goals put a wrong standard in front of the next generation. There should not be any compromise of morality in attaining a cause, no matter how pious or religious it is. Because the idea of a goal being scared and beneficial is always subjective. For instance, one specific community attaining freedom from a regime may be specify it as a revolution, but the same idea would be perceived as separatism/terrorism by the other side. So, carrying out violence against the innocent people will in no way justify the cause, consequently it will help in undermining the same cause. Therefore, no matter how important the cause is, it of utmost importance to follow the peaceful and ethical means in attaining it. As per the Gandhi's philosophy, it important to practice non-violence and truthfulness, even if you are fighting. against a tyrannical regime. This supports the assertion, that no immoral and unethical means undertaken for gaol achievement are justifiable.
Secondly, our history has a lot of examples in which if a person or a group utilises unprofessional or unethical means to achieve a goal, would be left in wane in future. Because, no matter how hard you try to hide the truth, it will definitely come out in public. For example, if a person is bad at clearing a LSAT exam, and instead of studying and working hard for it, he pays a brighter student to undertake the exam for him/her. The exam would be cleared but, would he/she be able to become a good lawyer? The answer to this question would always be "No". It justifiable to be passionate regarding achieving your goals but one should never cross the legal and moral obligations.
Finally, some may argue that in a particular situation it of best interest to bend a few rules to achieve a specific to goal which would be of salubrious to everyone involved. But, while doing this are we setting a good standard for our future generation? And, as per my opinion we are not, and in the long run this will cause devastating effects.
In conclusion, I believe one should always adhere to the moral and ethical obligation in pursuing goals, no matter how indispensable they are.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...e goal is justifiable, even if the goal if worthy. Following are the two illustrat...
^^
Line 3, column 1053, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Against
...truthfulness, even if you are fighting. against a tyrannical regime. This supports the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... history has a lot of examples in which if a person or a group utilises unprofessi...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...o achieve a goal, would be left in wane in future. Because, no matter how hard you try to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...exam would be cleared but, would he/she be able to become a good lawyer? The answe...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...argue that in a particular situation it of best interest to bend a few rules to achieve...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2200.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86725663717 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9648461133 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537610619469 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8734496818 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159278547667 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434208354169 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416478252131 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866100088049 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583602314051 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.