If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of prompt has posited that any kind of attempts which leads to achieving a worthy goal is defensible. This is a claim with which I strongly do not concur. Among the countless reasons and facts which give adherence to my standpoint, I would list the most conspicuous ones in what follows.
The first striking reason which should be highlighted here is a vague definition of a goal. In other words, the value of something or its worthiness is variable and has been differently explained by each individual. In this situation, meanwhile, a case is evaluated as worthy by one person, it can be considered as worthless by another. Besides, in modern life which millions of people directly or indirectly are interconnected to each other, there should be a common-sense among them until society persists its unity. By consideration of these two crucial points, and according to the prompt viewpoint, while a group of people who have done a task which is ranked as lawful by this group, can disturb others who possess the counter perspective. This contrast can lead to internal conflict and chaos in society. Therefore, for the sake of ambiguity of worth among the people, this sentence cannot be accepted by entire people.
Another noteworthy point which should be bolded here is sources required for achieving aims. It is lucidly obvious that any prosperity necessities rearing sources, these sources can be categorized as the man force or materials. For any success and achievement, there should be an investment of nonrenewable man forces and materials. In this scenario, this investment should worth that success. As an instance, a governor of a city believes that the big portion of lands in that city should be allocated for the industry until the city would have a concrete financial status. This idea seems logic and profitable. However, the boundary of this city is limited, and the high ratio of lands with factories is equal to the lower land with vegetation. Indeed, the city loses a massive area of its landscape and green spaces for gaining a higher income. Do this investment is justice and fear? Of course not, especially be the consideration of the environmental issues caused by this plan, the worthy goal is unacceptable.
However, some people may assert that patriotism orientated goals deserve any kind of scarifies and any means for their achievement is acceptable. Although this assertation seems sound in the first glance, it is not reasonable is some important situation. If a patriotism goal which requires the war as a mean for its success, the entire attempts are an injustice. According to the refreshing survey conducted in my place, approximately in each war between two countries which lasts for a month, one hundred people die. Based on this data, does this triumph received by the scarification of millions of people in a country is defensible?
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and facts comprehensively depict that not all kinds of means for the achievement is approvable.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- TPO 21 - integrated writing 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that teachers performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers 85
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 79
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctions, b 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, kind of, of course, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04980079681 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94836060761 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51593625498 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 783.0 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0324633202 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143583188369 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446295106271 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414896950979 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972748552221 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405810606346 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.