If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo

Essay topics:

If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Should we take any means to attain a justifiable goal, when it is worthy? From my perspective of view, it is reasonable for us to pursue with worthwhile goal despite tremendous effort behind. However, this doesn’t mean that we should blindly neglect concomitant negative effects of our relevant approaches. It is also worth to point out that deliberations for balancing between cost and gain as well as how to eliminate effectively side effect has to be scheduled in advance.

To start off, if we want to reach our reasonable targets either in life or at work, it is inevitable for us to spend efforts to realize them, because of relevant benefits and accumulated experiences. Normally, when talking about justifiable goal, we refer to certain purposes, which could bring about our positive influences, such as improved skills or unprecedented knowledge. From individual view, it is only through strenuous effort that we could grasp new knowledge and elevate our comprehension or ability into another advanced level. For example, despite suffering journey of GRE, a spate of students embracing with American dream still confronted with such challenges, as an idealistic GRE score could not only help them achieve their goal of learning in dream university, but also obtain a precious life experience aboard. On another hand, society also relies on such process to drive itself moving forward. Roosevelt’s New Deal Policy well exemplified my point. Undertaking highest priority of salvaging U.S. from the great depression, Roosevelt and American people have no hesitation to adapt governmental regulation and temporarily set aside market economy, because they understood how terrible ramification would be if American had been trapped with crisis in long time.

Furthermore, as getting accustomed to prioritizing our justifiable goals, we simultaneously suffered from a stereotypical assumption that any negative confluences accompanied by our means could be acquiesced. Unfortunately, such assumption could invoke irreparable negative impacts for us on either societal or individual level. Because as committed with certain target, people would be inclined to focus on it per so and sacrifice other equivalently important factors. A battery of cases serve for my point. Consider a factory whose owner tries to promote employee’s welfare despite limited budgets. A conspicuous decision would be to cut off unnecessary costs and reserve the only essential budge for production and sales for grasping more profit, which in turn convert to employee’s welfare. However, if it yield deleterious byproducts during production and budgets of purification devices also be eliminated, we can easily predict that social environment could be heavily vitiated. Therefore, to chase with certain target without considering relevant harms might establish a negative paradigm for society and threat both society and individual in the long run.

Last but not least, when it comes to how to choose a reasonable goal and eliminate side effect at the same time, this issue becomes more complex and needs thorough contemplation. First of all, before devoting to certain goal, it is necessary to raise question whether cost with achieving such goal could outshine gains and if it is still worth to do so under the worse circumstance. That is to say, both imminent benefits and gains in future should be considered at the same time. If and only if accumulated benefits dwarf costs accordingly, we can regard such goal as justifiable and put into our future calendar. On another hand, even if it is ineluctable to engender certain negative results, assuming germane remedy in time should be applied to eliminate them, in order for people to misconstrue our original goal. In another word, scarifications or immoral behaviors that we take shouldn’t be advocated in majority case, and it is because of extreme case that we resorted to them. A military decision in war is a perfect case in point. Even if a general knew that certain troop might be sent out to defend one city with high probabilities of scarification, he still had to do so, considering geometrical significance of the city in the war. However, a spate of resources should be deployed to avoid its huge causality for sake of avoiding the worst case.

In summary, it is beneficial for us to make endeavor for certain wholesome goal during our life. However, as discussed before, it is evident that sometimes deleterious ramifications could stem from our approach which pave the way to our goal. Therefore, even if we can tentatively start our endeavor audaciously, leaving concerns aside temporarily, a more thorough contemplation for different factors is still worthwhile in advance.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l confronted with such challenges, as an idealistic GRE score could not only help...
^^
Line 5, column 978, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Undertaking the highest'.
Suggestion: Undertaking the highest
... Deal Policy well exemplified my point. Undertaking highest priority of salvaging U.S. from the gre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 821, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'yields'?
Suggestion: yields
...employee's welfare. However, if it yield deleterious byproducts during productio...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in summary, such as, talking about, as well as, first of all, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 108.0 58.6224719101 184% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4020.0 2235.4752809 180% => OK
No of words: 749.0 442.535393258 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36715620828 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.23143043219 4.55969084622 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08964530615 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 387.0 215.323595506 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516688918558 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 1285.2 704.065955056 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 16.0 3.10617977528 515% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8223301167 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.677419355 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1612903226 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06451612903 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113674150611 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336585436224 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338352995948 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782491901004 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212762190419 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 207.0 100.480337079 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.