If people disregard the great work of the past , it is because these works no longer answer the needs of the present.
As, stated above the author describes the selfish nature of the present human race, that the present generation disregard the great work of the past only because they are no longer in need of the present generation . I accede with the statement of the author beacuse it reflects the present situation of the human race.
For instance , people will only use any of the past work if they in any case need it or have to review it for getting a conclusion for the research done by them. For example, the great works of Wright brothers are widely used by the avionics companies to get advancements in this field. Not only avionics companies but many other field of research used their outstanding work related to the fundamental of the cycles.. But once all of the conclusion is used from these works then people will simply disregard this kind of works and will focus on different works or invention of different fields.
However, one also have to pragmatic about how the work is being disregarded. That is if the conclusion of any work is disregarded or the complete existence of any work is disregarded. In addition to this , many people disregard great work of past simply because the conclusions made by them in those field is contradicting the conclusion of the past work . So, the disregarding of the past work is based on the proclivity of the present people and their needs.
Moreover, many such great work are also not disregarded by the people because their existence is the only cause of today's comfort and leisure and the advancement in technology. For instance, the new "relative quantum mechanism" is based on the great work done by Sir Issac Newton that is "The quantum theory" ,whose conclusions are the building blocks of the recent theory. There are many such examples other than the field of science of technology, where the work done in the past cannot be disregarded according to the need of the people.
Hence , the statement is amenable or not is decided by the predilection of the modern world people. People should always have to remember the past work that is significant in this modern human race and few great work can be disregarded by the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...longer in need of the present generation . I accede with the statement of the auth...
^^
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tuation of the human race. For instance , people will only use any of the past wo...
^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...widely used by the avionics companies to get advancements in this field. Not only...
^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...related to the fundamental of the cycles.. But once all of the conclusion is used ...
^^
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...he fundamental of the cycles.. But once all of the conclusion is used from these works the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...work is disregarded. In addition to this , many people disregard great work of pas...
^^
Line 3, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...adicting the conclusion of the past work . So, the disregarding of the past work i...
^^
Line 4, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...; is based on the great work done by Sir Issac Newton that is 'The quantum t...
^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n that is 'The quantum theory' ,whose conclusions are the building block...
^^
Line 5, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ording to the need of the people. Hence , the statement is amenable or not is dec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81962864721 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73298053198 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424403183024 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7970759211 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.133333333 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 5.21951772744 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522212185001 0.243740707755 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189303183198 0.0831039109588 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121238616857 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300788709146 0.150359130593 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075971424825 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.