dwqdwd
The author in the passage describes about the process "Prescibed fire" which involves setting forest fire deliberately which in turns reduces the risk factor of natural forest fire. Furthermore, passage describes about the advantages of pescribed fire. The professor in the lecture refutes the passage by giving many safe alternative to this process.
Firstly, the passage states that prescribed burning reduces the amount of fuel which accumulate on forest floor and can lead to a potential forest fire. The author further adds that prescribes fire burns low to the ground and cannot damage the large trees. However, the professor in the lecture posits that there are many alternatives to forest fire which is less dangerous than prescribed fire. The professor adds that Mechanical cleaning, thinning: Selling different trees which can cathc fire easy to comapnies which requires such tree and letting goats to clean the leaves and deadwoods which can lead to potential wild forest frire.
Seocndly, the passages clamis that prescibes fire can reduce the pollution which would occur during a wildfire and it also helps to restore nutrients to the soil and help forest to renew itself. However, the lectures states that fire is a part of nature and weather is always unpredictable. Moreover, if various other method are available which does not involve any kind of pollution then implementing those methods is a wise decision then using prescibed fires.
Thirdly, the author explains that prescribed fire is a science which should be practiced by forest professionals only after calculating the environment conditions around the forest. Furthermore, writer adds that out of many prescribed fires only one percent have been out of control. On the contrary, the professor explains that even if one percent gets out of control it can lead to a lot of damage and it can costs a lot to the residents near the forest and also to the government.the professor explains this poitn by citing an example of prescibed fire which resulted in a forst fire and caused damage to naitves around the forest.
Hence, by this way the author suppoets the use of prescribed fire and the professor refutes the author stand about the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, the professor in the lecture posits that there are many alternatives to fore...
^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at there are many alternatives to forest fire which is less dangerous than prescr...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less dangerous than prescribed fire. The professor adds that Mechanical cleaning,...
^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elp forest to renew itself. However, the lectures states that fire is a part of n...
^^
Line 13, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dly, the author explains that prescribed fire is a science which should be practi...
^^
Line 13, column 413, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'cost'
Suggestion: cost
... can lead to a lot of damage and it can costs a lot to the residents near the forest ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, third, thirdly, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20718232044 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68606744789 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494475138122 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7519380278 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.642857143 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.3589403974 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.