“Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.”
The more thing is from our comfort zone, the more it is acceptable. The prompt says that any truths start with refusing and it is treated as outrageous in particular that attacks the people beliefs or what they got familiar with. I totally agree, person always is more comfortable with the inherited ideas from past and accustomed to it in his daily life.
The main reason behind people refusing to any new truths is that they are acting out of fear of unknown or of what they are taught from their ancestors. For example, from several decades people believe that earth is straight and not rounded. However, when the truth of the earth is round declared, people didn’t easily accepted that idea. In that days, to come and say to one that earth is rounded, how can he imagine that there are some others in the other part of that sphere earth are upside down. However, by time passes and technology development, folk could see fact of earth is round and by such live movies from space agency (NASA) to the earth from space. Ultimately, this outrageous truth became accepted. This example indicates why any new idea even it is a truth faced by refusing.
Another example illustrates to what extent people will be suspicious towards any truth is out of their customaries. From 1400 years ago, people believe in that God is just the statue that they are created by themselves. These statues were being making from stones and even dates and when one feels hungry eats it although they were considered their God who pray and ask him for their needs. When prophet Mohammed came and asked them to submit to God who doesn’t have similar in the earth and he is only one, they didn’t accept that idea and didn’t leave what they bequeathed from their parents and inherited from their ancestors.
Further, when Galileo discovered that the earth moves around the sun and not visa versa, what did happen to him? The cleric men who believe in the opposite didn’t believe in him and accused him being heretic as he deviated from the religion. Because of his strange idea or deviated out of they were being taught in the churches, they sentenced him to life imprisonment. However, what is believed now regard the earth and sun? it completely became accepted. When the astronomers could proof with more advanced tools and technology; they led to no chance for doubts. All the above examples show that any truth out of our norms or what we are delivered from our ancestors, they are treated as deviation or heresy.
In conclusion, truth in some people’ eyes is what they used to deal with since they were born or what is they inherited from their past. Otherwise, they will don’t accept that truth easily to attacks their dogmas until these truths can proof themselves by evidence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easily accepted that idea. In that days, to come and say to one that earth is rou...
^^
Line 6, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... believed now regard the earth and sun? it completely became accepted. When the ...
^^
Line 6, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elieved now regard the earth and sun? it completely became accepted. When the as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 66.0 33.0505617978 200% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2312.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76701030928 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32601080895 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480412371134 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1574522366 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.52173913 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0869565217 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.52173913043 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0818710610692 0.243740707755 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317284563516 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461116859692 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586128947274 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358180413973 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.