The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.
The issue of whether the increasingly rapid pace of life causes more problems than it solves is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I mostly disagree with the statement for several reasons. Primarily, rapid pace of life enforces and teaches people to use time more efficient and planned. In addition, it makes possible to handle urgent issues in limited time interval.
First of all, I would like to point out that pace of life does not play a direct role in problem solving or creating one, but it may affect the ability of human beings to solve problems. As long as pace of life increases, people’s ability to think gets faster, because it enforces people to immediately react instant incidents. To illustrate let us look at the example of Marmara earthquake. In 1999, Marmara earthquake occurred in northwestern Turkey, and most of the injured people are saved by ambulance which is a product of rapid pace of life. In this circumstances, it is pretty obvious that rapid pace of life is necessary to solve problems in an easier way.
Furthermore, rapid pace of life teaches people to use time in a frugal way as it pushes them to do multiple tasks in a short time. Additionally, that efficient time management gives rise to individual’s productivity at daily routines such as checking e-mails, marking daily duties to the calendar. To bolster it further we can give the example of smart phone applications. They allow you to do multiple tasks at the same time. For example, the user may listen music while sending messages or recording a video or can do all of them simultaneously. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that rapid pace of life helps us to solve complex issues with ease.
Admittedly, some may argue that rapid pace of life creates more problems rather than solving them. This is true especially when it comes to instant accidents which could not happen when pace of life was slower. For example, in the past, people could not send a letter to a foreigner by mistake, but now, we can send even our most private information in milliseconds thanks to technology which is also a product of rapid life pace. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that rapidness of life pace is responsible for these unfortunate accidents, because it gives you the opportunity that how to benefit from that speed.
In conclusion, although there are some unwanted results of rapid pace of life, they are all based on individual mistakes. As long as people adapt to that speed, whole society will benefit from it. In fact, this is an inevitable reality of the developing world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... is a product of rapid pace of life. In this circumstances, it is pretty obvious tha...
^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a frugal way" with adverb for "frugal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...pace of life teaches people to use time in a frugal way as it pushes them to do multiple tasks ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89207048458 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78965692505 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526431718062 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9341238703 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.954545455 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346937750608 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107665223861 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132301439731 0.0758088955206 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205562013823 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995333582253 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.