As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The issue of whether or not the ability of humans to think for themselves is decreasing as they rely more on technology to solve problems is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that the ability of humans to think for themselves is getting better, because improvement of technology depends on human intelligence. Additionally, solving daily life issues with technology, allows people to use their time more efficiently.
First of all, I would like to point out that the ability of human thinking in a complex way results in high technology products such as mobile phones, software solutions, etc. To illustrate let us look at the example of chat bots. Nowadays, most of the websites and client services started to use these bots which communicates with customers and understand their needs; even they can solve most of the customer problems autonomously. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that raising technology forces humans to think for themselves in a harder way.
Furthermore, raising technology offers the benefit of handling some daily routines without wasting time. For example, rather than reading newspaper, we can listen daily news with our cell phone while having breakfast. In this way, our brain deals with more useful jobs which have potential to improve our ability to think in a limited time. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that relying on technology has a good impact on our thinking for ourselves.
Admittedly, handling most of the works by using technology has some side effects too. This is true especially when it comes to food applications. As people get used to ordering unhealthy foods on these applications, they are getting lazy and lazy. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that technology makes people lazy, because it is all about that individual’s decisions. If people use these services in a conscious way, it saves them a lot of time to do other works which make brains work such as reading, writing blog etc., since they will not spend time for cooking.
In conclusion, although some may argue that technology makes the ability of humans to think deteriorated, it is a flawed argument. Since we are responsible for our time management, we cannot blame the technology for our laziness; even we can use these opportunities to create time to do more creative jobs that makes our brain work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not the ability of humans to think for them...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a complex way" with adverb for "complex"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... out that the ability of human thinking in a complex way results in high technology products suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 449, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a conscious way" with adverb for "conscious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...decisions. If people use these services in a conscious way, it saves them a lot of time to do othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11027568922 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88123553472 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541353383459 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4389948956 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.277777778 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254249876563 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843557497821 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659995788057 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156072891397 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695136027838 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.