An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.
The author claims that use of new variety millet , enriched in Vitamin A will decrease the Vitamin A deficiency in Tagus by some evidence like action by government. Although these evidences appear to bolster the author's argument,there are some fallacious in the author's argument ,and some questions which are to be addressed to justify the author's argument which are discussed below.
First,the author assumes that use of subsidy will increase the potential of growing new millet. This assumption is faulty because only on relying on subsidy, farmers might not grow the new variety in their field because new variety always do not yield better. Also, miller might not be beneficial crop in Tagus which yields very less than other crops. So only subsidy cannot increase the production of non beneficial crops which occur high risk to grow. So , study-trial on the effects of the new variety millet should be done at first of all in Tagus district by the research expert and analysed the benefit cost ratio before implementing it.
Secondly, author assumed that people definitely grow and consumed the new variety millet since it is one of the staple food in Tagus. Being staple food, millet might not grow in Tagus, people could buy millet from the other parts of country. So author should first do enough study on the ecology and crop diversity in Tagus. Even if there grow the new millet seeds, they might not consume it by themselves. They might sell it to other parts thinking to get high price for the new nutrient rich variety. So along with the distribution of seeds,it's importance in the health of Tagus people for consumption should be well informed to the people.
Thirdly, author mentioned just government should do everything to promote the new millet. He had not clearly mentioned for what type of activities the government should do and focused on.Without the clear and stated activities, any projects might not do as expected.
In this different ways, the author argument is limited. Further research is needed on various topics
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...or claims that use of new variety millet , enriched in Vitamin A will decrease the...
^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...h these evidences appear to bolster the authors argument,there are some fallacious in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...s appear to bolster the authors argument,there are some fallacious in the authors argu...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...gument,there are some fallacious in the authors argument ,and some questions which are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... some fallacious in the authors argument ,and some questions which are to be addre...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hich are to be addressed to justify the authors argument which are discussed below. F...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ument which are discussed below. First,the author assumes that use of subsidy will...
^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... field because new variety always do not yield better. Also, miller might not b...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riety always do not yield better. Also, miller might not be beneficial crop in T...
^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... crops which occur high risk to grow. So , study-trial on the effects of the new v...
^^
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty millet should be done at first of all in Tagus district by the research expert...
^^
Line 7, column 543, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , its
... So along with the distribution of seeds,its importance in the health of Tagus peopl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Without
...the government should do and focused on.Without the clear and stated activities, any pr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01759530792 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53025282611 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533724340176 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5681990831 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.647058824 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268342930765 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928191508504 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674608924 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129155146522 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685418466697 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.