Issue - Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals play a significant role in introducing problems that might have been overlooked by reformers. Scandals expose these problems to society, this situation benefits the society because they focus the attention on specific issues that generally have not been solved yet. I agree with the statement because the potential benefits arising from scandals contribute to enhance the social fabric.
Perhaps the scandals are more visible in the political field, where several advances in public policy have been shaped due to scandals. I could quote the Mexican political arena, where some revelations about a conflict of interest between the President of Mexico and a governmental contractor derived in a meticulous scrutiny of the relationship between public employees and potential contractors for the government. Laws preventing this corruption were created as a result of this scandal — while it is uncertain that these laws fully mitigate corruption the law-implementation by itself sets a standpoint for the rule of law. Society benefits from this scandal because it enhances its legal framework.
Social scandals brings the attention to social problems that end up beneficing the society. A remarkable example can be found in the rise of Mexican rebels in the state of Chiapas, where a group of unified farmers fought against the vicious corruptions arising from the Federal government. This social movement rapidly spread out across Mexico. Several sectors of society, such as renewed intellectuals and political figures, supported the movement. The emerging of this movement was considered a social scandal in the Mexican society because it pointed out the corruption and the poverty that farmers were facing on a daily basis, ultimately, it contributed to enhance the social fabric due to showing that a social movement can defy an authoritarian government.
Furthermore, in the economic field a significant scandal exposed by insider from the big banks caused the greatest financial recession —the Credit crunch—, where the discovering of a huge amount of low-credit mortgage granted from big banks to many borrowers created a financial crash. Global financial regulators did not foresee this recession in advance, this is because the old financial regulator system was no longer suitable to face this kind of financial crunch. Nonetheless, after the Credit crunch was contained the financial regulation system analyzed and corrected its mistakes during the Credit Crunch, this revised financial system had an improved regulatory framework. Although this scandal had many negative consequence in the economic field it did help to enhance the economic architecture of society by improving the financial regular system.
Summing up, scandals address situations that end up bringing benefits to society. Reformers might not have seen these problems before and scandals show a path towards the resolution of such problems. I consider that this is extremely positive for the development of social fabric, therefore, I found myself in agreement with the author statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 683, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m had an improved regulatory framework. Although this scandal had many negative conseque...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252964426877 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.160079051383 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122529644269 0.0880659088768 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0296442687747 0.0497285424764 60% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0276679841897 0.0444667217837 62% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128458498024 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0592885375494 0.0406280797675 146% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90224304318 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0197628458498 0.030933414821 64% => OK
Particles: 0.0098814229249 0.0016655270985 593% => OK
Determiners: 0.142292490119 0.0997080785238 143% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0098814229249 0.0249443105267 40% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0158102766798 0.0148568991511 106% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3084.0 2732.02544248 113% => OK
No of words: 471.0 452.878318584 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.54777070064 6.0361032391 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.492569002123 0.366273622748 134% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.397027600849 0.280924506359 141% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.271762208068 0.200843997647 135% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.171974522293 0.132149295362 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90224304318 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 219.290929204 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511677282378 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 59.5599883599 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.7894736842 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3746504944 59.4972553346 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.315789474 141.124799967 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7894736842 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.578947368421 0.674092028746 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 64.4922337691 51.4728631049 125% => OK
Elegance: 2.02727272727 1.64882698954 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272139303094 0.391690518653 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120066332608 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.074070941945 0.077325440228 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.558096348058 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156495287556 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118224352811 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602071527001 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356927951759 0.385218514788 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.094751932978 0.0692045440612 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200538847909 0.275328986314 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388599571756 0.0653680567796 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.30420353982 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.