The number of road accidents are increasing by the day, as the number of vehicles being added each day is increasing at an exponential rate. Road safety has become more important than ever before. The author states that adults should not be legally bound to wear seat belts if they know the dangers involved in not wearing them. I strongly disagree with the authors point of view, and present the following points to bolster my view. Knowing that a certain thing is dangerous to us doesn't make us invulnerable to it. We merely are more cautious towards the dangers. Large number of accident casualties can thank seat belts for saving their lives.
Firstly, if we are aware of a danger we merely are more cautious towards it. At times, we might extend this cautiousness and go ahead prepare ourselves to avoid these mishaps from happening. But all this doesn't make us invulnerable to the danger. We merely are just less prone to get affected by it. Similarly, knowing about the dangers involved in not wearing a seat belt, doesn't make us immune to road accident. Seat belts are an intrinsic part of the cars today. They are not provided as an add on feature to the car for a very specific reason. The reason being that safety is not a luxury that must be provided to only certain people. The seat belts are scientifically proven to absorb a large amount of momentum when a vehicle encounters an impact with some other object. The momentum is equally divided by the patented 3 point seat belt. Thus protecting the passengers against major concussions and bruises. The effect of the impact is also arrested as the passengers are not thrown off their seats.
Secondly, there are a lot of statistics that support wearing a seat belt, as it saves lives. If we look at the amount of fatalities involved in the accidents where the passengers weren't wearing seat belts to the casualties involved in the accidents where passengers were wearing seat belts, we see the amount of casualties in the latter were fewer. Even Formula 1 race car drivers who are at the pinnacle of high speed driving suggest wearing seat belts. There are many occasion where the car they drive are in tatters but the driver survived because of the seat belt.
Finally, the author suggests that knowing about the danger is enough, but he fails to realize that its just first step in the process of avoiding the whole mishap. To present an analogy, we all know fire is dangerous, but merely knowing about it, does not mean we are ready to experiment our pyrotechnics. We need to explore all possible scenarios before we get into the act. We must have protective eye gear, gloves and fire extinguisher in case the fire goes out of control. Similarly, we need to take precautions before driving a car too. We need to start with trivial checks such as checking if the tire air pressure is fine, check if air bags are present in the car. And when you start driving, even before you start the engine make sure you wear your seat belt, and make other passengers wear their seat belts.
To conclude, road safety is not one persons onus. It is a collective effort as a society. We as adults must encourage safe practices such as wearing seat belts. As the saying goes, better safe than sorry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 483, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...that a certain thing is dangerous to us doesnt make us invulnerable to it. We merely a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...se mishaps from happening. But all this doesnt make us invulnerable to the danger. We ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rs involved in not wearing a seat belt, doesnt make us immune to road accident. Seat b...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he cars today. They are not provided as an add on feature to the car for a very specif...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 778, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nters an impact with some other object. The momentum is equally divided by the pate...
^^^
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'belt' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'belts'.
Suggestion: belts
...ly divided by the patented 3 point seat belt. Thus protecting the passengers against...
^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...d in the accidents where the passengers werent wearing seat belts to the casualties in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun occasion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many occasions'.
Suggestion: many occasions
...g suggest wearing seat belts. There are many occasion where the car they drive are in tatters...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'thus', 'such as', 'to start with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234920634921 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.185714285714 0.157235817809 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0698412698413 0.0880659088768 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0587301587302 0.0497285424764 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.068253968254 0.0444667217837 153% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.112698412698 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0555555555556 0.0406280797675 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43603321919 2.79330140395 87% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0301587301587 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0015873015873 0.0016655270985 95% => OK
Determiners: 0.103174603175 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00952380952381 0.0249443105267 38% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126984126984 0.0148568991511 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3257.0 2732.02544248 119% => OK
No of words: 575.0 452.878318584 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66434782609 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.58838876751 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326956521739 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.222608695652 0.280924506359 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.135652173913 0.200843997647 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0765217391304 0.132149295362 58% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43603321919 2.79330140395 87% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 219.290929204 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474782608696 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 57.32458544 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6194690265 165% => OK
Sentence length: 16.9117647059 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4126016179 59.4972553346 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7941176471 141.124799967 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9117647059 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.411764705882 0.674092028746 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 39.1726342711 51.4728631049 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.28934010152 1.64882698954 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396643349035 0.391690518653 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.08274275468 0.123202303941 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0631776205529 0.077325440228 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.424253815492 0.547984918172 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127380186114 0.149214159877 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121937210308 0.161403998019 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822865809617 0.0892212321368 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.427645924711 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.146805500076 0.0692045440612 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270953650602 0.275328986314 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808758342357 0.0653680567796 124% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.30420353982 302% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.