The given argument is flawed for numerous reasons. The conclusion pointed out in the passage based on some unwarrented assumptions and they will be elaborated below.
First of all, the passage points out that the ancient records show that the number of turfted groundhog was several millions. However, the passage does not indicate any current statistics about tufted groundhog. It is possible that there is still a glut of tufted groundhog and the construction of a road will have a negligeable effect on their number. It is also likely that the current amount tufted groudnhog is so scarse and is deterotiating with singificant rate, so that governmental measures are unlikely to resolve the issue.
Secondly, the passage shows information about sea otter decline in Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria. However, based on what happened to sea otter, we cannot make conclusions and decisions about tufted groundhog. If the landscape fulll of constructions are inimical to the existense of sea otters, it does not mean that it will have the same effect on turfted groundhog. Therefore, it should be first found out whether tufted groundhogs and sea otters prefer similar lifstyle and perefer similar landscape.
Even if we assume that groundhogs and sea otters have similar responses to the development along their living area, we do not know what exactly was the reason of decline in the number sea otters. There might be some other reasons for their decline. It is possible there were some environmental issues on the landscape. For example, the temperature might have been increased or decline which led to the decline of the number of sea otters.
Lastly, is it correct that we are comparing Neighboring Eastern Capenteria. May be Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria has pretty different landscape and is not possible to be compared with West Lansburg. It is also possible that no construction has taken place on Neighboring Eastern Capenteria until now, which means that the reason of population decline of sea otters is not because of developmental sanctuary.
Based on the arguments which have been discussed above, the conclusion pointed out in the passage is not correct. Some more evidence and unwarrednted assumptions must be taken into considerations before making decision about West Lansburg sanctuary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns and they will be elaborated below. First of all, the passage points out ...
^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t is also likely that the current amount tufted groudnhog is so scarse and is det...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3152173913 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89628534662 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483695652174 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1338829223 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.947368421 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854664651398 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309361297853 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233963685939 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466784683479 0.150359130593 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00966702350077 0.0667264976115 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.