Nowadays, there is an increasing debate about whether all students should be studied with the same national cirriculum. In my opinion, there are both positive and negative aspects of this suggestion. On the one hand, it is good to create the same conditions and opportunites for everyone. On the other hand, it might be a good idea to create highly specialized and complex curriculums for students who are keen from their yound ages. Also, it is good to create various cirrucums specialized in something particular (eg. music, sport, science) for students who has talant in that field.
On the one hand, it is good to create different curriculums for students. If some students are more intelligent and keen than their colleagues, then, it would be better to create more difficult study programs for them. Otherwise, those smart students might deteroriate with other weaker students.
However, it also good to create the same curriculum for everyone and provide the same opportunities for their future. If they will be divided by their level, then, for weaker students, it will be more difficult to get into colledge due to the competition with smarter students.
Secondly, some students have some kind of talant in a particular field (eg. music, sport, science). Therefore, it would be better to create different curriculums for students who have a talant in music, sport or science. In this way, the students can further improve their skills and get specialized in that without wasting much time on other courses.
However, these kind of skills during our childhood may not be important. It is better to let students to study all the courses and let them decide what they like more. Also, it is highly likely that their interests will change a lot as they grow up. Therefore, children are unable to decide what they want to do for the rest of their life.
Generally, I think that there are both positive and negative sides of this recommendation. Every nation should decide for themselves depending on what kind of consequencies they are ready to face.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing particular eg. music, sport, science for students who has talant in that fiel...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tudents who has talant in that field. On the one hand, it is good to create di...
^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...uch time on other courses. However, these kind of skills during our childhood may not ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, i think, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 28.8173652695 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 344.0 441.139720559 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00581395349 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6877511454 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476744186047 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 4.96107784431 262% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2845908329 57.8364921388 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 119.503703932 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.380952381 23.324526521 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190786131822 0.218282227539 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598583042926 0.0743258471296 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693336479354 0.0701772020484 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105653667304 0.128457276422 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363641167498 0.0628817314937 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.3550499002 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 98.500998004 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.