It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man ot woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to whixh you agree ot disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Observed through the lens of a microscope, character is scrutinized by society. this forms a judgemental scope in defining what a hero really is. such critique of character makes it impossible for living heroes to exist, is what this statement is essentially saying. while I do agree that additional information allows for more in-depth analysis of character, some of which may be unfavorable, heroes are not necessarily unflawed beings.
First, society is a function of individual beliefs manifested. As such, individual values create a basis for social role models e.g. a swimming athlete may idolize michael phelps for his athletic ability. individual values are not universal throughout society e.g. another individual may be in avid rejection of recreational marijuana use and view michael phelps as a menace.
Dirty laundry airs freely through tabloids and social media. The term "fake news" was coined in the U.S. 2016 presidential election to denote meaning to misinformation on mass scale. A growing number of ways to communicate over the years including television broadcasts, internet access and fairly easy travel allows opportunity for miscommunication. For this reason, attributing qualities to the character of a hero may require more research than done in the past.
Investing time in learning about the qualities of a hero allow individuals to choose what values are important to them. Just as society is built up of differing values, heroes are multidimentional beings. A 2015 study found that lawyers are umoung the top earners in the United States, a characteristic many people idolize. The same study found that 75% of lawyers struggle with cocaine addiction, a problem that most people hope to avoid. Choice heroes are those whose redeeming qualities reflect personal goals. A person does not need to agree with a hero figure 100% of the time, rather an educated person should be able to identify qualities which bring inspiration and draw from those.
In conclusion, society is a function of individuals that patterns behaviors after those we see. Having heroes is inevitable. An increased accessibility to information allows deeper scrutiny of a heroes character which also unearths their flaws. Not all heroes are unscrupulous and therefore, while it may be more difficult than in the past, heroes still exist within society today.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e, character is scrutinized by society. this forms a judgemental scope in defining w...
^^^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...t this statement is essentially saying. while I do agree that additional information ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Individual
...ichael phelps for his athletic ability. individual values are not universal throughout soc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'heroes'' or 'hero's'?
Suggestion: heroes'; hero's
...information allows deeper scrutiny of a heroes character which also unearths their fla...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., first, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39946380697 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98751195251 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597855227882 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.228654852 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9047619048 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7619047619 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95238095238 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137504927652 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394836109153 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285240171855 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07563054606 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278307204341 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.