It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public.
There is a heated debate among the people that whether it is necessary for politicians to conceal information from the public. In the prevailing value of the society, integrity is definitely an important property of a person; however, once the scope is extended to the politician who is in charge of the future of a country, I agree that appropriate level of hiding information is acceptable and necessary.
I concede that an insidious purpose of withholding information is by no mean justifiable. It brings the corruption to the government and undermine democracy. Once information is block from accessing by the public, political leaders are able to utilize their power to benefits themselves or even their friends. For example, without superintending by the public, a politic in the higher position can exploit his power and relationship to intervene in the hiring procedure of the government facility. As a result, a country’s democracy would be eclipsed by the cronyism and unbreakable hierarchy.
However, other than these sordid aspects of withholding information, I assert that some strategic ways to withhold the information are acceptable and necessary. Firstly, in order to realize their aspirations, politicians need to win the campaign and get the power of running a government first. To achieve it, politician may hide some minor disadvantages or foibles in their lives. After all, who did not make minor mistakes, such as what Washington did in his childhood, cutting father’s cherry tree, in their whole lives. Once these foibles are known by their rivals, they may magnify or even distort it to drag them down. Think about that, if a politician with enough ability and talent can prosper a country in the future but fail to achieve it just because it is ruined by unjustifiable rumors from their opponents. How miserable it can be for a country?
Moreover, other compelling examples to support politicians can withhold information come from the purpose of protecting the advantages of whole country. For one thing, most of countries have their well-established laws to protect their sensitive information from spreading. To illustrate, a country’s data related to military is mostly contained know from few people. The cutting-edge research projects are restricted to trade with others. Once this crucial information is acquired by ulterior people, it will vitiate the country’s security or competitiveness. Similarly, politician may personally hold some sensitive information, which need to be controlled properly to ensure whole country’s stability. In the time of disease’s pandemic, many unsubstantiated or even fake information influx into the government. The head of the government need to withhold, filter or control this information to prevent the people of the country from turmoil or panic.
To sum up, regardless a self-conserving or evil purpose, it is necessary and justifiable for a politician to withhold specific information. For a leader of a country, we need to focus on their ultimate goal, that is, whether the action that he or she do is actually benefit the country as a whole, rather than the superficial sneaky aspect of the action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
...ntages of whole country. For one thing, most of countries have their well-established laws to pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...t is, whether the action that he or she do is actually benefit the country as a wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, well, after all, for example, such as, as a result, for one thing, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2693.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33267326733 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19413122261 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526732673267 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 855.9 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9844066575 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.208333333 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0416666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2858719747 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777134342171 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776604114035 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16766418334 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598779188331 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.