It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The identification of a person through social groups is an important question to ask. I agree with the statement partially, and I will explain details that a person also defines by his or her own personal interests as well.
As a person grows up, there are factors that can shape his or her identification. In the early stage of life, a child can learn social behavior through the process of observational learning. For example, if parents react negatively, a child will learn to react negatively as well. Furthermore, in the school, when a child goes to school, teachers and peers will become the social group that influences and shapes his or her identification. Peer pressure can positively affect a child. For example, a child could try to do new activities in order to get more involved with their friends. However, it could be a negative peer pressure as well. For instance, some teenagers might choose to try smoking when they actually did not want to try. Therefore, a person's identification can be shaped by social groups.
However, I believe that people do not identify themselves through social groups only. There are other personal factors that define them. For instance, if a person decides to be an economic lecturer, it comes from his or her own expertise by taking economic courses in both Bachelor's and Master's degree in economics. A person may also have experiences in tutoring economics for many years. Therefore, the identity of the person does not come from social groups rather than his or her own skills and experiences.
In conclusion, defining a person does not necessarily define via social groups only. It is the personal skills and experiences that could define a person’s identity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ually did not want to try. Therefore, a persons identification can be shaped by social ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00696864111 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87212862693 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8233638046 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.8333333333 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144300751745 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052783765671 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041303201026 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108196556881 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448187336754 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.